2008
DOI: 10.1215/0094033x-2008-014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hannah Arendt on the Secular

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…32. For two excellent explorations of the topic of secularization in Arendt's work, see Brient (2000: 515) and Moyn (2008). 33.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32. For two excellent explorations of the topic of secularization in Arendt's work, see Brient (2000: 515) and Moyn (2008). 33.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tropes recurred, Arendt suggests, because a retrograde conception of identity-"the age-old and, unfortunately, religiously anchored dichotomy of Jews and Gentiles"-simultaneously persisted (Arendt 1964, p. 11). It may be unsurprising that the author of On Revolution, where Arendt critiques the persistence of religion in modern politics and models their future secularization on revolutionary America (Moyn 2008), would lament the influence of religious thinking on a war crimes trial. More notable is the fact that in making this point in Eichmann in Jerusalem, Arendt relies on Rousset.…”
Section: David Rousset the Shoah And Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…unmistakable; in both cases the meanings attached to the -people‖ can also be traced back to Europe. Historians and philosophers have in fact devoted considerable attention to the meanings of the -people‖ as conjured up in the American constitution (and the American revolution), particularly in comparison with both earlier and later popular revolutions in Europe [10,36,37]. And yet when cast against the Indian case-and the larger worldwide history of the conundrum of sovereignty-the distinctive invocation of the -people‖ in the American constitution's preamble takes on distinctive meanings.…”
Section: Afterthoughtmentioning
confidence: 99%