2018
DOI: 10.1177/0731121418763583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Happily Ever After? Exploring U.S. Collegiate Women’s Understandings of Love as Impermanent and Timeless in the Age of Capitalism

Abstract: This study examines the impact of popular cultural tropes and contemporary ideologies on U.S. collegiate women’s constructions of romantic love and marriage. Although research shows that shifts in the public sphere intimately affect the private realm, little is known regarding how young women negotiate concurrent romantic ideals and capitalist notions of romance. Based on interviews with 30 collegiate women, we argue that women’s negotiations of romantic love and marriage can be understood through conceptualiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those with debt, across social class, believe that their debt load will delay their timelines for marriage and family formation. This paper adds to a relatively small but growing literature (Edin and Kefalas 2005; Kefalas et al, 2011; Koontz and Norman 2019; Korteweg 2001; Kuperberg and Mazelis 2021; Miller, Sassler, and Kusi-Appouh 2011; Rackin and Gibson-Davis 2017; Tevington 2018) examining the ways in which young people frame their decisions about marriage. Additionally, it furthers the conversation on marital paradigms (Carroll et al 2007; Willoughby 2010; Willoughby and Hall 2015; Willoughby, Medaris, et al 2015) among young adults by including analysis of attitudes among postcollege respondents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Those with debt, across social class, believe that their debt load will delay their timelines for marriage and family formation. This paper adds to a relatively small but growing literature (Edin and Kefalas 2005; Kefalas et al, 2011; Koontz and Norman 2019; Korteweg 2001; Kuperberg and Mazelis 2021; Miller, Sassler, and Kusi-Appouh 2011; Rackin and Gibson-Davis 2017; Tevington 2018) examining the ways in which young people frame their decisions about marriage. Additionally, it furthers the conversation on marital paradigms (Carroll et al 2007; Willoughby 2010; Willoughby and Hall 2015; Willoughby, Medaris, et al 2015) among young adults by including analysis of attitudes among postcollege respondents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%