2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2009.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Happiness and capability: Introduction to the symposium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, however, there has been a proliferation of studies on the measurement and determinants of happiness or subjective well-being (often used interchangeably in the literature). A common conclusion from this literature is that individual subjective assessments of happiness or life satisfaction are meaningful and valid indicators of wellbeing, and they provide a more inclusive and holistic picture of welfare than traditional objective measures, such as income or consumption (Frey and Stutzer 2002;Kahneman and Krueger 2006;Angner 2010;Stutzer and Frey 2010;van Hoorn et al 2010). Studies have also shown that subjective well-being measures are highly correlated in mostly predictable ways with a variety of demographic, economic and societal-level characteristics, and that these relationships often have important implications for public policy (the review article by Stutzer and Frey 2010 provides a useful summary).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, however, there has been a proliferation of studies on the measurement and determinants of happiness or subjective well-being (often used interchangeably in the literature). A common conclusion from this literature is that individual subjective assessments of happiness or life satisfaction are meaningful and valid indicators of wellbeing, and they provide a more inclusive and holistic picture of welfare than traditional objective measures, such as income or consumption (Frey and Stutzer 2002;Kahneman and Krueger 2006;Angner 2010;Stutzer and Frey 2010;van Hoorn et al 2010). Studies have also shown that subjective well-being measures are highly correlated in mostly predictable ways with a variety of demographic, economic and societal-level characteristics, and that these relationships often have important implications for public policy (the review article by Stutzer and Frey 2010 provides a useful summary).…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question has come to the fore in recent years and scholars in both fields seem interested in bridging the gap between both approaches (see the introductions to two special issues and the respective special issues, i.e. van Hoorn et al, 2010;Comim, 2005). Capability scholars often include insights from subjective well-being research into their approach, e.g.…”
Section: Bridging the Gap: Subjective Well-being Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the capability approach offers an open framework for analysis, it seems that most of the attempts of a synthesis have aimed at incorporating insights from subjective well-being research into the capability framework, e.g. making happiness one valuable functioning among others that 1 See also Clark (2006), p. 179, andvan Hoorn et al (2010), p. 339.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also a growing literature on the similarities and differences between the capability approach and subjective well-being (for example, van Hoorn, et al, 2010;Bruni, et al, 2008). A number of scholars believe that despite the differences between the concept of SWB and the capability approach, the two concepts are overlaps and synergies.…”
Section: Relevance Of the Swb Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, by definition, open to the subjective view of the people, since capabilities are defined as the ability or opportunity that a person has to do or be what she values and has reason to value. What a person values is subjective and context-dependent and that is where the concept of subjective well-being could come in.There is also a growing literature on the similarities and differences between the capability approach and subjective well-being (for example, van Hoorn, et al, 2010;Bruni, et al, 2008). A number of scholars believe that despite the differences between the concept of SWB and the capability approach, the two concepts are overlaps and synergies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%