2017
DOI: 10.4169/mathhorizons.25.1.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Happiness Is Integral But Not Rational

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately for the study of fractional base happy numbers, as shown in [6], for any p > q > 1, the only p q -happy number is 1. This is because any other number that would map to 1 by S e, p q is not in Z + .…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately for the study of fractional base happy numbers, as shown in [6], for any p > q > 1, the only p q -happy number is 1. This is because any other number that would map to 1 by S e, p q is not in Z + .…”
Section: Proof Of Lemma 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a different direction, happy functions defined using expansions into fractional bases were introduced in [6] and studied further in [56]. Although each positive integer has a unique representation in a given fractional base, it should be noted that, given a fractional base expansion, it is generally not immediately evident whether the number is an integer or some other rational number.…”
Section: Alternative Bases and Domainsmentioning
confidence: 99%