2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11482-020-09872-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Happy but Vegetarian? Understanding the Relationship of Vegetarian Subjective Well-Being from the Nature-Connectedness Perspective of University Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 3 describes the method adopted to investigate the extreme case of vegan food experiences in Norway. Differently from the recent study about vegetarianism, understood in a broad way, and subjective well-being by Krizanova et al [16] that is quantitative, this study approach has a qualitative approach and triangulates several data sources. Section 4 presents and discusses the main findings, including some epistemological reflections on the adopted multidisciplinary approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 3 describes the method adopted to investigate the extreme case of vegan food experiences in Norway. Differently from the recent study about vegetarianism, understood in a broad way, and subjective well-being by Krizanova et al [16] that is quantitative, this study approach has a qualitative approach and triangulates several data sources. Section 4 presents and discusses the main findings, including some epistemological reflections on the adopted multidisciplinary approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of connectedness to nature has been conceptualized and measured in different ways in the literature; for example, Schultz (2002) developed the Inclusion of Nature in Self Scale to measure the degree to which an individual includes nature in the conception of self, whereas Mayer and Frantz (2004) developed the connectedness to nature scale (CNS) to assess an individual's affective and experiential connection with nature. Numerous previous studies have found a positive relationship between some form of connection with nature and a wide range of pro-environmental behaviours (e.g., Gosling & Williams, 2010;Ibáñez-Rueda et al, 2020;Kim et al, 2018;Krizanova & Guardiola, 2020;Mackay & Schmitt, 2019;Martin et al, 2020;Nisbet et al, 2009;Yusliza et al, 2020). In contrast to this literature, the influence that connectedness to nature may have on residential water use remains largely unexplored.…”
Section: The Role Of Connectedness To Naturementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Empirical evidence showed positive SWB effects from various pro-environmental behavior dimensions, including recycling behavior (e.g., [34,49]), sustainable and local consumption behavior (e.g., [44,50,51]), energy-saving behavior (e.g., [37]), and vegetarian food consumption [52]. Even though a positive relationship could not be established in every study (for example, the authors of [53] did not find a positive relationship between energy-saving behavior and SWB), there is broad empirical evidence for positive effects of pro-environmental behavior on SWB from various continents, including North and South America, Europe, and Asia [19].…”
Section: Pro-environmental Behavior and Subjective Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%