2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10902-015-9642-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Happy Talk: Mode of Administration Effects on Subjective Well-Being

Abstract: There is increasing interest in subjective well-being (SWB) both in academic and policy circles. As a result, considerable research efforts are now being directed at the validity and reliability of SWB measures. This study examines how SWB reports differ by survey mode. Using data from the April 2011-March 2012 Annual Population Survey in the UK we find that individuals consistently report higher SWB over the phone compared to face-to-face interviews. We also show that the determinants of SWB differ significan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates across datasets should therefore be compared with caution. On the other hand, it has been suggested that-similar to responses given to all subjective questionsself-reported subjective well-being is susceptible to mode of interview, with higher levels of evaluative, experienced, and eudemonic measures of well-being reported on telephone compared to face-to-face interviews (Dolan and Kavetsos, 2012). Mode effects have substantial implications for the comparability of our results between surveys given that the Eurobarometer uses face-to-face interviews, the BRFSS phone interviews, and Gallup uses a mix of phone and face-to-face interviews.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates across datasets should therefore be compared with caution. On the other hand, it has been suggested that-similar to responses given to all subjective questionsself-reported subjective well-being is susceptible to mode of interview, with higher levels of evaluative, experienced, and eudemonic measures of well-being reported on telephone compared to face-to-face interviews (Dolan and Kavetsos, 2012). Mode effects have substantial implications for the comparability of our results between surveys given that the Eurobarometer uses face-to-face interviews, the BRFSS phone interviews, and Gallup uses a mix of phone and face-to-face interviews.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breunig and McKibbin, 2011;Conti and Pudney, 2011) suggesting that respondents present themselves in more positive light in direct contact. However, Dolan and Kavetsos (2012) interviews and found that although correlation coefficients did not change as a function of survey mode, phone interviews were associated with significantly and substantially higher reports of well-being.…”
Section: Data Quality and Possible Biasesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…All models control for region of origin and for interview mode (face to face versus telephone), since the literature suggests there can be differences in reporting of life satisfaction by mode of interview ( e.g. Conti and Pudney 2008; Dolan and Kavetsos 2012). In separate analyses, we additionally drew on migrants’ destination country life satisfaction level (based on data for 2012 of the Gallup World Poll, published in the Better Life Index by OECD 2013); and for returnees, we calculated their length of stay in Europe before return to Turkey in years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%