2015 Workshop on Research, Education and Development of Unmanned Aerial Systems (RED-UAS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/red-uas.2015.7441016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haptic guided UAV for detection of radiation sources in outdoor environments

Abstract: This work proposes a haptic teleoperation system of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) aimed at localizing radiation sources in outdoor environments. Radiation sources are localized and identified by equipping the UAV with a CdZnTe-based custom X-ray detector providing light, compact, and low power operation. The UAV is guided in direct sight by the operator. The system allows exploration of potentially dangerous areas without a close exposure of the human operator. The operator is able to provide motion command… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The teleoperation approach is based on an impedance control mode where the user specifies the horizontal heading direction of the UAV by moving the tool point of the haptic device. In particular, a movement of the haptic device causes the change of the UAV waypoint [24], and so the direction of the UAV movement.…”
Section: Developed Technologies Methodologies and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teleoperation approach is based on an impedance control mode where the user specifies the horizontal heading direction of the UAV by moving the tool point of the haptic device. In particular, a movement of the haptic device causes the change of the UAV waypoint [24], and so the direction of the UAV movement.…”
Section: Developed Technologies Methodologies and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the two teleoperation modes have been designed to map the limited workspace of the haptic device to an arbitrarily large UAV workspace. In the first teleoperation mode ( ), position information read by the haptic interface (namely, the coordinates of the tool point) is used to compute the horizontal heading direction of the UAV [ 10 , 11 ]. In particular, the current displacement of the tool point of the haptic device with respect to its center is converted to a waypoint for the UAV in world coordinates as follows: where is the current position of the UAV in the world reference frame, is a constant and is the rotation matrix from the haptic coordinate system H to the world reference frame W .…”
Section: Visuo-haptic Augmented Reality Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative data have been collected such as the task completion time and the error between the location of the radiating substance, estimated by the operator, with respect to its actual location taking advantage of a video camera mounted on the UAV. Experiments show that a teleoperation approach that supports switching between heading-based and position to position control modes increases the position detection accuracy of the radio-active material with respect to a pure heading-based control mode [ 10 , 11 ]. Usability experiments, performed in a simulated environment, are also reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masone et al [9] proposed a method for semi-autonomous UAV path specification and correction where a human operator modifies the shape of the path of the UAV, while an autonomous algorithm ensures obstacle avoidance and generates force feedback. All these approaches differ from the haptic teleoperation scheme proposed in [12], which is further developed and evaluated in this paper.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A haptic rendering algorithm generates an attractive basin around the location of the most intense detected radiation, thereby reducing operator workload and minimizing the risk of dangerous conditions like collisions or crash. We extend previous work [12] by evaluating the haptic teleoperation interface in comparison with experiments where radiation detection is performed using pure visual feedback on the screen of the ground station computer. These experiments have been performed by an expert operator, using a small UAV in outdoor flight tests where the goal was to detect simulated nuclear sources assumed to be hidden on the ground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%