2015
DOI: 10.1002/geot.201500008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hard rock TBM Tunnelling – on the way to a better prognosis? / TBM‐Hartgesteinsvortriebe: Auf dem Weg zu einer verbesserten Prognose?

Abstract: Five universities from Austria, Germany and Switzerland, working intensively together with partners from the industry, client organisations, companies, consultants and TBM manufacturers, have combined to develop a new prognosis model for TBM advance rate and disc wear (the "ALPINE MODEL"). This article presents some new results from the project. Fundamentally, the new model is to be a development of the model from Gehring, which calculates the penetration from the ratio of disc load to uniaxial compression str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is namely the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) model [3] [4] as semi-theoretical and the Gehring model [5] as empirical model. The following paragraph provides a short summary whereas detailed description can be read in [2] and [6].…”
Section: Penetration Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is namely the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) model [3] [4] as semi-theoretical and the Gehring model [5] as empirical model. The following paragraph provides a short summary whereas detailed description can be read in [2] and [6].…”
Section: Penetration Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of this work, the second testing procedure has been used and adopted in some points which are briefly described in the next paragraph. For detailed information see [2] and [6].…”
Section: Penetration Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sci. 2022, 12, 1446 2 of 25 has disadvantages in extreme cases such as soft or very hard rocks [3,4]. Over the years, several different indices have been developed to offer reasonable quantitative measures for rock abrasivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%