2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2018.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hard-substrate habitats in the German Bight (South-Eastern North Sea) observed using drift videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Video tows were effected by either allowing the vessel to drift with wind and tide, or by steaming into the direction of drift to effect a speed over the ground of ≤ 0.25 ms −1 ; at any greater speed images were blurred and not usable for data extraction. This is consistent with contemporary practise for remote image-based sampling in deep water (e.g., Cánovas-Molina et al, 2016;Michaelis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Macro-epibenthos Surveyssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Video tows were effected by either allowing the vessel to drift with wind and tide, or by steaming into the direction of drift to effect a speed over the ground of ≤ 0.25 ms −1 ; at any greater speed images were blurred and not usable for data extraction. This is consistent with contemporary practise for remote image-based sampling in deep water (e.g., Cánovas-Molina et al, 2016;Michaelis et al, 2019).…”
Section: Macro-epibenthos Surveyssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The primary sampling technique was visual sampling using video and still images from sensors mounted on a towed benthic imaging sled, a technique now widely used for benthic habitat classification and mapping (Barker et al, 1999;Stevens and Connolly, 2005), and for monitoring of ecosystem changes over time (Sheehan et al, 2013;Stevens et al, 2014). Image-based underwater sampling has the advantage of being able to sample very large areas cost-effectively (Michaelis et al, 2019), and including sites beyond the practical reach of diver-based surveys (Enrichetti et al, 2019). The imagery also allows examination of the relationship between structural elements of the benthos in situ.…”
Section: Macro-epibenthos Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stones do not show a recognizable shadow as a consequence of either too low mosaic pixel resolution or because they are located too close to the nadir. Michaelis et al [9] have shown that the number of cobbles (6.3-20 cm) is approx. 25-fold larger than the number of boulders (20-63 cm) in the SOR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The sediment composition of the seafloor has a strong influence on the availability of such substrates. In environments with high sediment mobility, e.g., shallow shelf seas affected by waves and tides, hard substrates might become temporarily buried while previously buried ones might become exposed [9,10]. As yet, the spatial detection of underwater objects can only be achieved using hydroacoustic remote-sensing devices such as side-scan sonars (SSS), multibeam echo sounders (MBES), and parametric sediment echo sounders (pSES) (e.g., [11][12][13]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are -as well as the coarse sand -natural relicts of Pleistocene moraines (Köster, 1979;Zeiler et al, 2008) highly unlikely to be transported by tidal currents. However, they provide the only natural hard substrates in a soft-sediment environment, giving a habitat to some sessile species and serving as steppingstones in the dispersal of others (Sheehan et al, 2015;Michaelis et al, 2019). During sand mining, stones >10 cm are filtered out and remain on the seafloor (LKN-SH, pers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%