1975
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3261-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hard Tissue Tumors of Scleractinian Corals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
53
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Skeletal anomalies of scleractinian corals have been observed on reefs throughout the world including the Florida Keys (Peters et al 1986), Netherlands Antilles (Bak 1983), Hawaii (Squires 1965, Cheng & Wong 1974, Hunter & Peters 1993Grygier & Cairns 1996, Aeby 1998, Guam and Enewetak (Cheney 1975), Oman (Coles & Seapy 1998), Japan (Yamashiro et al 2000, and the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Loya et al 1984).…”
Section: Skeletal Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Skeletal anomalies of scleractinian corals have been observed on reefs throughout the world including the Florida Keys (Peters et al 1986), Netherlands Antilles (Bak 1983), Hawaii (Squires 1965, Cheng & Wong 1974, Hunter & Peters 1993Grygier & Cairns 1996, Aeby 1998, Guam and Enewetak (Cheney 1975), Oman (Coles & Seapy 1998), Japan (Yamashiro et al 2000, and the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Loya et al 1984).…”
Section: Skeletal Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D) affect 16 Caribbean (Table 2) and 24 Indo-Pacific (Table 3) scleractinian species, 1 Caribbean hydrozoan, and at least 5 species of Caribbean gorgonians (Table 2; Squires 1965, Cheney 1975, Morse et al 1977, Bak 1983, Goldberg et al 1984, Loya et al 1984, Peters et al 1986, Hunter & Peters 1993, Le Champion-Alsumard et al 1995, Grygier & Cairns 1996, Coles & Seapy 1998, Green & Bruckner 2000, Yamashiro et al 2000, Ravindran et al 2001, Dube et al 2002. Acroporids appear to be the most susceptible to neoplasia (Peters et al 1986, Coles & Seapy 1998, and this may be due to the rapid growth rates of this genus (Peters et al 1986).…”
Section: Skeletal Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that GAs increase in number on an infected individual over time, combined with their lack of normal polyp structure, reduced density of zooxanthellae and lack of digestive organs ) means that they negatively impact affected corals at Palmyra, particularly Acropora and Montipora species. Coral GAs are now widely acknowledged as a deleterious condition, capable of leading to reduced colony growth, decreased density of coral skeleton, loss of mucus secretory cells and nematocysts, reduced density of zooxanthellae, reduced fecundity, tissue necrosis, and a loss, reduction or degeneration of normal polyp structure (Cheney 1975, Bak 1983, Peters et al 1986, Coles & Seapy 1998, Yamashiro et al 2000, Gateno et al 2003, Domart-Coulon et al 2006, Work et al 2008.…”
Section: Disease Severity Fate and Temporal Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 F). Because of the appearance of uncontrolled growth, destruction of polyps, changes in cell structure and function, and spread of the abnormal skeletal growth along a branch, this condition appears to be a true neoplasia of the coral (Cheney, 1975;Bak, 1983; J. C. Harshbarger, pers. comm.).…”
Section: Other Microparasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%