2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty2952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hard X-ray view on intermediate polars in theGaiaera

Abstract: The hardness of the X-ray spectra of intermediate polars (IPs) is determined mainly by the white dwarf (WD) compactness (mass-radius ratio, M/R) and, thus, hard X-ray spectra can be used to constrain the WD mass. An accurate mass estimate requires the finite size of the WD magnetosphere R m to be taken into the account. We suggested to derive it either directly from the observed break frequency in power spectrum of X-ray or optical lightcurves of a polar, or assuming the corotation. Here we apply this method t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
128
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
16
128
1
Order By: Relevance
“…See e.g., Frank et al 2002), and T max = α 3 16 µm H k GM R , where α = 0.65 ± 0.07 for non-mCVs (Yu et al 2018). In previous works, the T max of several dozens of CVs have been measured via X-ray continuum fitting, and the derived M WD were in general consistent with the dynamically determined values (e.g., Suleimanov et al 2005;Shaw et al 2018;Suleimanov et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…See e.g., Frank et al 2002), and T max = α 3 16 µm H k GM R , where α = 0.65 ± 0.07 for non-mCVs (Yu et al 2018). In previous works, the T max of several dozens of CVs have been measured via X-ray continuum fitting, and the derived M WD were in general consistent with the dynamically determined values (e.g., Suleimanov et al 2005;Shaw et al 2018;Suleimanov et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…5, with a mean value < M WD >= 0.84 ± 0.17 M . The modified PSR model accounting for the finite size of the magnetosphere was also recently applied to a set of 35 IPs observed with NuSTAR and Swift/BAT by Suleimanov et al (2019), who find more accurate WD masses with an average value of 0.79±0.16 M , but still consistent with previous results. Massive WD primaries were also found by Zorotovic et al (2011), using a set of "fiducial" CVs with reliable WD masses (left middle panel of Fig 5) with a mean value < M WD,fiducial >= 0.82 ± 0.15M .…”
Section: The Mass Distribution Of Hard X-ray Ipssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…What's more, the white dwarf's accretion rate (1.2 × 10 −9 M⊙yr −1 ) derived from Suzaku observations is lower than the companion's mass loss rate predicted by the stellar evolution code for most systems (∼ 10 −9 -10 −7 M⊙yr −1 ). Such phenomena seem usual in IPs with orbital period above 6 hours, as reported by Suleimanov et al (2019). The strong variability and the lower accretion rate of the system could be caused by the propeller mechanism.…”
Section: Discussion and Summarysupporting
confidence: 55%