2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2023.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HARDC : A novel ECG-based heartbeat classification method to detect arrhythmia using hierarchical attention based dual structured RNN with dilated CNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 38 Another study by Islam et al introduced the same model architecture without employing the attention mechanism, achieving an accuracy of 99.99%. 39 Besides, Khan et al utilized CNNs to classify five types of arrhythmias. To address the data imbalance, they employed the SMOTE–Tomek technique and achieved 92.86% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 38 Another study by Islam et al introduced the same model architecture without employing the attention mechanism, achieving an accuracy of 99.99%. 39 Besides, Khan et al utilized CNNs to classify five types of arrhythmias. To address the data imbalance, they employed the SMOTE–Tomek technique and achieved 92.86% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method achieved an accuracy of 99.60% during training, 99.40% during validation and 99.01% during testing. 39 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of comparing our proposed method with the aforementioned approaches 17,[19][20][21][22][23][24] on the MIT-BIH dataset are presented in Table 3, and for the PhysioNet 2017 dataset, the results are shown in Table 4. It is evident that the proposed method outperforms other methods, whether on the MIT-BIH dataset or PhysioNet 2017 dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further evaluate the effectiveness of ISR-LSTM network, we empirically and specificity (SPF) for performance assessment [39,40]. From Table 2 and Table 3, evaluation indicators of ISR-LSTM-ResNet50 are 0.2 to 1.9 percentage points better than that of LSTM-ResNet50 and ResNet50…”
Section: Architecture Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%