2006
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.46.325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardness Based Creep Life Prediction for 2.25Cr-1Mo Superheater Tubes in a Boiler

Abstract: Fig. 1.MHP-s correlation for new and service-exposed 2.25Cr-1Mo tubes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The long term creep rupture lifetime is often estimated using shortterm creep rupture data. Some past observation of remnant life on service exposed materials has been reported in literature [3][4][5][6][7][8]. But in these studies scatter characteristic of service exposed material is not taken into account for damage/remaining life assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The long term creep rupture lifetime is often estimated using shortterm creep rupture data. Some past observation of remnant life on service exposed materials has been reported in literature [3][4][5][6][7][8]. But in these studies scatter characteristic of service exposed material is not taken into account for damage/remaining life assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The breakpoint does not seem to be determined by any of the batch characteristics so the variation in this breakpoint between the batch must be just random in nature.  or the variation in failure times for each batch, is predominantly determined by x 2 , x 7 x 12 and x 16 which are the Rockwell hardness of the batch, the P content of the batch, the Cu content of the batch and whether that batch went through heat treatment 2. These loading were then used to form the q partial least squares components 1q T given by Eq.…”
Section: Results Of Step 2 Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation energy (b 2 ) has a very strong systematic component with 84.6% of the batch to batch variation in b 2 being explained by T 12 with the remaining random variation measured by   u2 = 109.5. The scale parameter also has a very strong systematic component with 83.0% of the batch to batch variation in s being explained by T 16 with the remaining random variation measured by   u6 = 0.01. Even the break point seems to be well predicted by the partial least squares component T 15 .…”
Section: Results Of Step 2 Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations