2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3022537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardware Design of Concatenated Zigzag Hadamard Encoder/Decoder System With High Throughput

Abstract: Both turbo Hadamard codes and concatenated zigzag Hadamard codes are ultimate-Shannonlimit-approaching channel codes. The former one requires the use of Bahl-Cocke-Jelinek-Raviv (BCJR) in the iterative decoding process, making the decoder structure more complex and limiting its throughput. The latter one, however, does not involve BCJR decoding. Hence its decoder structure can be much simpler and can potentially operate at a much higher throughput. In this paper, we investigate the hardware design of a concate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, d − 1). Compute the extrinsic MI of the information bit using (36), where p e (ξ|X = x) denotes the PDF of the LLR values given the bit x being "0" or "1". Form the extrinsic MI matrix {I eh (i, k)} of size m × d. (Details of the method is shown in Appendix B.)…”
Section: Code Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, d − 1). Compute the extrinsic MI of the information bit using (36), where p e (ξ|X = x) denotes the PDF of the LLR values given the bit x being "0" or "1". Form the extrinsic MI matrix {I eh (i, k)} of size m × d. (Details of the method is shown in Appendix B.)…”
Section: Code Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…code-division multiple-access [29] and interleave-division multiple-access [30]) with severe inter-user interferences, or embedding low-rate information in a communication link. The most notable channel codes with performance close to this limit are turbo-Hadamard codes [31], [32], [33], [34], concatenated zigzag Hadamard codes [35], [36], and LDPC-Hadamard codes [27], [28]. Both turbo-Hadamard codes and concatenated zigzag Hadamard codes suffer from long decoding latency due to the forward/backward decoding algorithms [31], [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 5, the blue edges correspond to B 0 (12), the red ones correspond to B 1 (13), and the green ones correspond to B 2 (14). Note that the "connections" represented by the dashed (red and blue) lines do not exist.…”
Section: Spatially Coupled Ldpc Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] and [10], very low-rate turbo Hadamard codes and zigzag Hadamard codes have been proposed. However, their decoders require the use of serial decoding [11], [12], [13] and cannot make use of parallel decoding as in LDPC decoders. The error performances of turbo Hadamard codes and zigzag Hadamard codes are also not as good as those of the LDPC-Hadamard codes that are subsequently proposed [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…code-division multiple-access [37] and interleave-division multiple-access [38]) with severe interuser interferences, or embedding low-rate information in a communication link. The most notable channel codes with performance close to this limit are turbo-Hadamard codes [39], [40], [41], [42], concatenated zigzag Hadamard codes [43], [44], and LDPC-Hadamard codes [35], [36]. Both turbo-Hadamard codes and concatenated zigzag Hadamard codes suffer from long decoding latency due to the forward/backward decoding algorithms [39], [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%