2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10192447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation of Self-Driving Electric Vehicles by Dynamic Path Planning and Model Predictive Control

Abstract: This paper applies a dynamic path planning and model predictive control (MPC) to simulate self-driving and parking for an electric van on a hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) platform. The hardware platform is a simulator which consists of an electric power steering system, accelerator and brake pedals, and an Nvidia drive PX2 with a robot operating system (ROS). The vehicle dynamics model, sensors, controller, and test field map are virtually built with the PreScan simulation platform. Both manual and autonomous driv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…𝑃𝑃 𝑏𝑏 = 1.5𝐾𝐾 𝑐𝑐 𝑢𝑢 𝑏𝑏 − 𝜏𝜏 𝑏𝑏𝑠𝑠 𝑃𝑃 ̇𝑏𝑏 (22) where 𝑃𝑃 𝑏𝑏 is the applied brake pressure, 𝐾𝐾 𝑐𝑐 is the simple pressure gain, 𝑢𝑢 𝑏𝑏 is the brake setting and 𝜏𝜏 𝑏𝑏𝑠𝑠 is the brake lag. By considering 𝜗𝜗 is as the simple pressure gain and 𝐾𝐾 𝑏𝑏 is the cylinder pressure gain, the brake torque can be calculated as:…”
Section: Mathematical Model Of the In-wheel Motor-based Electric Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…𝑃𝑃 𝑏𝑏 = 1.5𝐾𝐾 𝑐𝑐 𝑢𝑢 𝑏𝑏 − 𝜏𝜏 𝑏𝑏𝑠𝑠 𝑃𝑃 ̇𝑏𝑏 (22) where 𝑃𝑃 𝑏𝑏 is the applied brake pressure, 𝐾𝐾 𝑐𝑐 is the simple pressure gain, 𝑢𝑢 𝑏𝑏 is the brake setting and 𝜏𝜏 𝑏𝑏𝑠𝑠 is the brake lag. By considering 𝜗𝜗 is as the simple pressure gain and 𝐾𝐾 𝑏𝑏 is the cylinder pressure gain, the brake torque can be calculated as:…”
Section: Mathematical Model Of the In-wheel Motor-based Electric Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the results have contributed significantly to the development of knowledge about IWM-EV, the results are still weak and questionable. This is because the tests conducted on IWM-EV capabilities are still limited to simulationbased tests [6], [8], [20] and HILS methods [14], [21][22][23] that require some simplification, justification, and assumptions during the tests. It is common knowledge that justification and assumptions may inaccurately reflect the data and likely result in inaccurate predictions [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, in the case of safety-critical applications in the industry, functional safety and HIL simulation are the most significant methods for reliable production. The following text will discuss the historical overview of different HIL simulation fields through particular examples within the automotive industry [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], electric drive control [37][38][39][40], power electronics converters [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], electric grid applications [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], railway traction systems [60][61][62], and education [63][64][65][66]…”
Section: V-models For the Development Procedures And Functional Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIL testing has many benefits, as it is faster, more cost-effective, and repeatable than a pure experimental approach while offering greater fidelity than a pure simulated approach (Fathy et al, 2006). HIL testing is used to advance path planning for autonomous vehicles (Chung and Yang, 2021), improve electric drive controller performance (Bouscayrol, 2008), and test regenerative railway braking systems (Pavlović et al, 2021), to name just a few of its applications. This paper focuses specifically on a type of HIL testing called dynamic load emulation, which can be understood as a subset of a larger class of HIL experimental-computational hybrid control approaches across a broad range of applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%