2021
DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.720702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardware Methods for Onboard Control of Fluidically Actuated Soft Robots

Abstract: Soft robots provide significant advantages over their rigid counterparts. These compliant, dexterous devices can navigate delicate environments with ease without damage to themselves or their surroundings. With many degrees of freedom, a single soft robotic actuator can achieve configurations that would be very challenging to obtain when using a rigid linkage. Because of these qualities, soft robots are well suited for human interaction. While there are many types of soft robot actuation, the most common type … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, attention for electronics-free actuation and control of soft robots has grown. [35][36][37][38][39] Equivalents of basic building blocks of digital control, such as logic gates, are being re-invented in the fluidic domain. As a result, we also see basic…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, attention for electronics-free actuation and control of soft robots has grown. [35][36][37][38][39] Equivalents of basic building blocks of digital control, such as logic gates, are being re-invented in the fluidic domain. As a result, we also see basic…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the material deformation in soft robots is typically caused by fluid pressure, microfluidic technology could help achieve a fine distribution of active actuation sites. Nevertheless, there have only been a few publications on the interface between robotics and microfluidics (56)(57)(58)(59).…”
Section: Microfluidics To Bridge Robotics and Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soft fluidic actuators are typically actuated at frequencies below 1 Hz. [ 12 ] Therefore, we are targeting a minimum amplifier bandwidth of 0.25 Hz.…”
Section: Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latency of the fluidic circuits that we envision is the sum of the response times of each component in the circuit which includes logic, power, and analog operations. According to McDonald et al's [ 12 ] review of typical operating speeds, pressure‐driven soft fluidic actuators have response times on the order of seconds or longer; some exceptions such as Mosadegh et al's [ 8 ] high‐speed robot operating at 20 Hz were noted. With this in mind, our aim was to not impede the overall system response time by designing for an amplifier with a larger bandwidth than a microfluidic circuit and soft actuator at the input and output of the amplifier, respectively.…”
Section: Amplifier Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation