2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2010.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardy spaces of the conjugate Beltrami equation

Abstract: We study Hardy spaces of solutions to the conjugate Beltrami equation with Lipschitz coefficient on Dini-smooth simply connected planar domains, in the range of exponents $1<\infty$. We analyse their boundary behaviour and certain density properties of their traces. We derive on the way an analog of the Fatou theorem for the Dirichlet and Neumann problems associated with the equation ${div}(\sigma\nabla u)=0$ with $L^p$-boundary data

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…with ess sup The fact that f solves (1) and satisfies (3) entails that f has a non-tangential limit almost everywhere on T 1 , denoted by tr f , and the trace in (2) has to be understood in this sense. Moreover, f is unique up to a purely imaginary constant, and if we normalize f by 2π 0 Im tr f e iθ dθ = 0, then f is unique and…”
Section: The Conjugated Beltrami Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…with ess sup The fact that f solves (1) and satisfies (3) entails that f has a non-tangential limit almost everywhere on T 1 , denoted by tr f , and the trace in (2) has to be understood in this sense. Moreover, f is unique up to a purely imaginary constant, and if we normalize f by 2π 0 Im tr f e iθ dθ = 0, then f is unique and…”
Section: The Conjugated Beltrami Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important difference with the case of simply connected domains, due to the fact that the boundary has now two connected components, is that, in the Dirichlet problem, we prescribe the real part of the solution on one part of the boundary and the imaginary part on the other. Another difference with [2] is that we only assume that ν ∈ W 1,q R (G 2 ) for some q ∈ (2, +∞] instead of being Lipschitz continuous.…”
Section: The Conjugated Beltrami Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,38,39 Our previous work on Na 2 IrO 3 using the local-density approximation (LDA) + U method has reported a Neel-type collinear antiferromagnetic-ordered ground state with fully gapped bands, with its magnetic moments parallel to the Ir honeycomb plane without any favoring direction inside the layer. 40 In contrast, several experimental observations and first-principle calculations 27,28,41 independently suggest a zigzag-type antiferromagnetic order (zigzag-AF) in-plane ordering of spin- 1 2 moments for the same material. Theoretical investigations had been concentrated on explaining this magnetic ground state within the framework of the HK model.…”
Section: Magnetic Exchange Interactions From the Tight-binding Hamentioning
confidence: 99%