2016
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harm reduction and female genital alteration: a response to the commentaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aesthetic and plastic surgeons espouse women's (and girls') right to choose genital surgeries, including labiaplasty, and report client satisfaction after these procedures (Goodman et al 2016;Hardwick-Smith 2011). The potential of therapeutic labiaplasty has also been acknowledged as an approach to curbing non-therapeutic female genital alteration where this is commonly practiced (Arora and Jacobs 2016). Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACOG] (2007[ACOG] ( , 2017 argue against labiaplasty unless medically necessary for adolescent females under 18.…”
Section: Girls' Developing Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aesthetic and plastic surgeons espouse women's (and girls') right to choose genital surgeries, including labiaplasty, and report client satisfaction after these procedures (Goodman et al 2016;Hardwick-Smith 2011). The potential of therapeutic labiaplasty has also been acknowledged as an approach to curbing non-therapeutic female genital alteration where this is commonly practiced (Arora and Jacobs 2016). Nevertheless, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ACOG] (2007[ACOG] ( , 2017 argue against labiaplasty unless medically necessary for adolescent females under 18.…”
Section: Girls' Developing Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%