2012
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7517-9-30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harm reduction in Cambodia: a disconnect between policy and practice

Abstract: In 2003 the Government of Cambodia officially began to recognise that harm reduction was an essential approach to preventing HIV among people who use drugs and their sexual partners. Several programs aiming to control and prevent HIV among drug users have been implemented in Cambodia, mostly in the capital, Phnom Penh. However, there have been ongoing tensions between law enforcement and harm reduction actors, despite several advocacy efforts targeting law enforcement. This study attempts to better understand … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Article 107 states that “forced treatment shall not be imposed unless there is a serious situation;” but it does not define the term “seriousness” or the level of “seriousness.” Articles 45 and 53 implicitly criminalize repeated use of drugs by PWID/PWUD by stating that “drug users who have already received forced treatment and rehabilitation and are caught using drugs again will face imprisonment from one to six months.” Further, Article 40 articulates that “a person in possession of drugs faces imprisonment from two to five years,” without specifying the amount of drugs carried. As a result, police officials have challenges in distinguishing between PWID/PWUD and drug dealers [11]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Article 107 states that “forced treatment shall not be imposed unless there is a serious situation;” but it does not define the term “seriousness” or the level of “seriousness.” Articles 45 and 53 implicitly criminalize repeated use of drugs by PWID/PWUD by stating that “drug users who have already received forced treatment and rehabilitation and are caught using drugs again will face imprisonment from one to six months.” Further, Article 40 articulates that “a person in possession of drugs faces imprisonment from two to five years,” without specifying the amount of drugs carried. As a result, police officials have challenges in distinguishing between PWID/PWUD and drug dealers [11]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Violation of human rights and physical abuses of PWID/PWUD take place regularly [10], making PWID/PWUD live in fear of being arrested and/or removed from communities [10]. In many cases, PWID/PWUD were isolated from health, education, legal support, and other harm reduction services [10, 11]. Another repercussion of the VCSP was that besides the police’s suppressing approach, communities could report illegal activities, such as drug use, to local authorities [11, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Research has also sought to understand the perspectives of police at the interface between policing and HIV programmes working with key populations and have variously described contributors to negative policing behaviour including the poor understanding of HIV and HIV programmes, the lack of appropriate police training, poor communication from HIV programmes to police [17] and structural drivers of poor police performance such as low salaries and the setting of arrest quotas that specifically require police to target people who use drugs [18]. In response to the ongoing tensions between police, HIV programmes and the people that need access to these programs, various multilateral agencies [19], researchers [20] and civil society organizations (CSOs) [21] have recommended the need for enhanced partnerships between police and HIV programmes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%