2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harm reduction or amplification? The adverse impact of a supervised injection room on housing prices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, closing prices of properties within 1,000m of SCSs rose faster than those in control neighbourhoods, indicating community wide benefits of SCS implementation (Table 2, Figure 2). These results contradict findings recently reported by Liang and Alexeev who found a 5 -7% reduction in residential real estate closing prices in Victoria, Australia (Liang & Alexeev, 2023). However, their study significantly differed from ours in several ways.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, closing prices of properties within 1,000m of SCSs rose faster than those in control neighbourhoods, indicating community wide benefits of SCS implementation (Table 2, Figure 2). These results contradict findings recently reported by Liang and Alexeev who found a 5 -7% reduction in residential real estate closing prices in Victoria, Australia (Liang & Alexeev, 2023). However, their study significantly differed from ours in several ways.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Given NIMBY sentiments stem from complex social, cultural and political perspectives, it is important to understand the effects of harm reduction interventions on local communities (Bosque-Prous & Brugal, 2016). With minimal exploration of the effects of SCSs on neighbourhoods; (Liang & Alexeev, 2023) these perceived threats have repeatedly barred agencies from operating SCSs in high-risk communities (Guye A, 2021;Supervised Consumption Services Review Committee & Alberta Health, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our outputs suggest homes sold within 200 m of SCS potentially incurred a negative price shock immediately following the implementation of the first two SCS which includes the largest SCS located in the densest neighbourhoods. These results imply neighbourhoods experience a penalty similar to the 5–7% observed by Liang and Alexeev following the implementation of Victoria, Australia’s first SCS ( Liang & Alexeev, 2023 ). However, unlike Liang and Alexeev, we also observed positive price trends sufficient to close the price gap within nine months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Given NIMBY sentiments stem from complex social, cultural and political perspectives, it is important to understand the effects of harm reduction interventions on local communities ( Bosque-Prous & Brugal, 2016 ). With minimal exploration of the effects of SCS on neighbourhoods’ housing values ( Liang & Alexeev, 2023 ); these perceived threats have repeatedly barred agencies from operating SCS in high-risk communities ( Guye , 2021; Supervised Consumption Services Review Committee & Alberta Health, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to account for potential clustering effects within the data, clustered standard errors were employed in the analysis. Moreover, due to the relatively small number of clusters in the dataset, an additional robustness test using wild bootstrap was also conducted [41]. The wild bootstrap method allows for the generation of pseudo-samples with replacement, addressing the limitations posed by the limited number of clusters and providing further validation of the model's results [42].…”
Section: Statistical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%