2022
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2021.3135300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonic Suppression and Size Reduction of a Low-Profile CP Patch Antenna by Using Nondegenerate Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As for the measured results, a gain of 3 dBi is obtained for the proposed DCPW-fed filtering TCM. Regarding stopband efficiency, it is observed that an average improvement of 37.8% is accomplished using the proposed design. A maximum suppression level of −41 dB is achieved by the proposed design, and an average of −18 dB is maintained throughout the stopband frequency range. In comparison to the literature, 2.4% (Zebao et al , 2014), 10.97% (Li et al , 2018), 58.5% (Biswas et al , 2013), 43.9% (Liu et al , 2021b), 68.8% (Hou et al , 2021), 65.8% (Yun et al , 2021), 8.5% (Ali et al , 2006), 59.8% (Yun et al , 2020) and 60.9% (Pan et al , 2018) of improvement is observed for −41 dB suppression. Besides, Zebao et al (2014) show −40 dB suppression, and Ali et al (2006) show a peak suppression of −50 dB, which is 18% higher than the proposed filtering antenna. Concerning stopband performance, the proposed design shows a stopband efficiency of +12.2 GHz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As for the measured results, a gain of 3 dBi is obtained for the proposed DCPW-fed filtering TCM. Regarding stopband efficiency, it is observed that an average improvement of 37.8% is accomplished using the proposed design. A maximum suppression level of −41 dB is achieved by the proposed design, and an average of −18 dB is maintained throughout the stopband frequency range. In comparison to the literature, 2.4% (Zebao et al , 2014), 10.97% (Li et al , 2018), 58.5% (Biswas et al , 2013), 43.9% (Liu et al , 2021b), 68.8% (Hou et al , 2021), 65.8% (Yun et al , 2021), 8.5% (Ali et al , 2006), 59.8% (Yun et al , 2020) and 60.9% (Pan et al , 2018) of improvement is observed for −41 dB suppression. Besides, Zebao et al (2014) show −40 dB suppression, and Ali et al (2006) show a peak suppression of −50 dB, which is 18% higher than the proposed filtering antenna. Concerning stopband performance, the proposed design shows a stopband efficiency of +12.2 GHz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, it is 40% greater on comparing to (Yun et al , 2021). The bandwidth attainment shows an increment of 79.8% (Li et al , 2018), 74.7% (Zhi-Li et al , 2012), 42.2% (Hou et al , 2021), 81.9% (Yun et al , 2021), 51.6% (Nie and Tu, 2021), 93.7% (Ahmad, 2022), 55.9% (Yun et al , 2020) and 59.4% (Pan et al , 2018) is observed. Using an FR4 substrate, a gain of 5.1 dBi (reference antenna) and 3.3 dBi (filtering antenna) is achieved from the simulated results. As for the measured results, a gain of 3 dBi is obtained for the proposed DCPW-fed filtering TCM. Regarding stopband efficiency, it is observed that an average improvement of 37.8% is accomplished using the proposed design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations