2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonisation of a new assessment method for estimating the ecological quality status of Greek running waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variation of biological quality in the olive mill wastewaters receiving tributary (Kotitsanis stream) upstream and downstream of the olive mill outlet during 2 years of monitoring. The biological quality of the sites was estimated with the HESY2 Index (Lazaridou, Ntislidou, Karaouzas, & Skoulikidis, ) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Combined Effects Of Drought and Pollution On The Evrotas Aqumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation of biological quality in the olive mill wastewaters receiving tributary (Kotitsanis stream) upstream and downstream of the olive mill outlet during 2 years of monitoring. The biological quality of the sites was estimated with the HESY2 Index (Lazaridou, Ntislidou, Karaouzas, & Skoulikidis, ) [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Combined Effects Of Drought and Pollution On The Evrotas Aqumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multimetric index STAR_ICMi was selected as the most appropriate one, since it showed pressure-response relationships to a number of pressures (NO 3 -N, PO 4 -P, CAPi). The Hellenic Evaluation System 2 (Lazaridou et al, 2018), however, which was successfully intercalibrated for other river types in Greece (R-M1, R-M2, R-M4, R-M5), did not qualify for the classification of very large rivers, because it did not respond statistically to pressures at this river type. This could be attributed to the specific characteristics of HESY2 (e.g., its habitat standardization; Lazaridou et al, 2018), which require a strict adherence to the multihabitat sampling protocol.…”
Section: The Greek Classification Methods For Very Large Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hellenic Evaluation System 2 (Lazaridou et al, 2018), however, which was successfully intercalibrated for other river types in Greece (R-M1, R-M2, R-M4, R-M5), did not qualify for the classification of very large rivers, because it did not respond statistically to pressures at this river type. This could be attributed to the specific characteristics of HESY2 (e.g., its habitat standardization; Lazaridou et al, 2018), which require a strict adherence to the multihabitat sampling protocol. In very large rivers, however, samplings were mainly conducted at the riverbanks, and thus habitat standardization was not applicable.…”
Section: The Greek Classification Methods For Very Large Riversmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the First Cycle of Management, all RBMPs had identifed the significant pressures from point sources, diffuse sources, water abstraction sources, groundwater abstractions, flow regulation and morphological alterations, saline intrusion, artificial recharge, land cover and population density, and other pressures [8,9]. Since then, numerous research approaches [11][12][13][14][15] have tried to promote the River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) of the WFD implementation process by developing methods for the monitoring and assessment of rivers' ecological status, by taking into account objective indicators demonstrative for hydromorphological, water physicochemical, and biological elements [16,17]. Seasonal or more frequent water sampling, hydromorphological analysis, identification of pollution patterns and sources (mainly through land cover/use analysis) and advanced statistical elaborations are some of the available tools that have been extensively used in order to determine the most water quality-relevant and significant environmental variables.In Greece, water quality and hydromorphological monitoring of all river and catchment sizes is systematically implemented on the last decades compared to other countries [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%