1986
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1986.182.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonising Botanical and Cultivar Classification With Special Reference to Hardy Heathers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its high popularity is due to the introduction of mutants with extended flowering time into commercial breeding. The so-called “bud-bloomers” (or “bud-flowering” phenotypes [2]) were probably derived from two British clones collected in 1936 and 1948 and several individuals found in natural populations in 1970 in the Netherlands [1]. Today, bud-bloomers make up the major market share of C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its high popularity is due to the introduction of mutants with extended flowering time into commercial breeding. The so-called “bud-bloomers” (or “bud-flowering” phenotypes [2]) were probably derived from two British clones collected in 1936 and 1948 and several individuals found in natural populations in 1970 in the Netherlands [1]. Today, bud-bloomers make up the major market share of C .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Munson, 1984. This is made easier if they can be grouped under some botanical category (since all are basically natural products) which will also cover wild, not yet cultivated, plants (McClintock, 1986). T o cite just one example, plants of Erica tetralix L. with untypical racemose inflorescences instead of the usual umbel, have been grouped under forma racemosa (McClintock, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%