2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonization of firm CSR policies across national contexts: Evidence from Brazil & Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies investigated the internationalization of CSR strategies in a single country context, but did not focus on reporting practices and mostly used interviews in their research approach (Beddewela and Fairbrass, 2016;Beddewela and Herzig, 2013;Bondy and Starkey, 2014;Bondy et al, 2012;Jamali and Neville, 2011). Studies that made two-country comparisons focused on CSR practices, rather than reporting (Brammer and Pavelin, 2005;Mazboudi, 2020) or investigated CSR reporting in a non-parent-subsidiary context (de Villiers and Alexander, 2014;Dumitru et al, 2017;Farooq and de Villers, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies investigated the internationalization of CSR strategies in a single country context, but did not focus on reporting practices and mostly used interviews in their research approach (Beddewela and Fairbrass, 2016;Beddewela and Herzig, 2013;Bondy and Starkey, 2014;Bondy et al, 2012;Jamali and Neville, 2011). Studies that made two-country comparisons focused on CSR practices, rather than reporting (Brammer and Pavelin, 2005;Mazboudi, 2020) or investigated CSR reporting in a non-parent-subsidiary context (de Villiers and Alexander, 2014;Dumitru et al, 2017;Farooq and de Villers, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, believed that more focused comparative studies based on two countries were also needed. Some authors have already taken this approach to provide new insights into CSR-related issues in Australia and South Africa (de Villiers and Alexander, 2014), the UK and the US (Brammer and Pavelin, 2005), Australia and New Zealand (Farooq and de Villers, 2019), Brazil and Sweden (Mazboudi et al, 2020) and Poland and Romania (Dumitru et al, 2017). However, to the best of our knowledge, studies comparing CEE countries with non-CEE/non-European Union (EU) countries are non-existent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This collaboration may benefit local development, as it may overcome challenges, for example, in education, health, or infrastructure (Cantwell et al., 2010; Doh et al., 2017). A variety of benefits may result from the combination of MNCs and institutional voids, as corporate social responsibility is recognized as a practice to counterbalance institutional voids (Mazboudi et al., 2020). This process is also of great interest to MNCs, as it helps with their legitimization and publicity (Yang et al., 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, CSR studies face many challenges in addressing the complexity and fluidity of the Asian context. Given the pressures of globalization and the expected harmonization of management practices across cultures, there are many arguments that all organizations should apply the same CSR practice regardless of cultures, religions and nations (Mazboudi et al, 2020). Moreover, there are also weaknesses in how context has been conceptualized and empirically explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%