2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2019.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonization of GEOV2 fAPAR time series through MODIS data for global drought monitoring

Abstract: HighlightsA harmonization procedure of GEOV2 and MODIS fAPAR data is introduced.Systematic overestimations of GEOV2 anomalies compared to MODIS are removed.Temporal consistent standardized anomalies can be used in drought studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.1 Data for the production of global long-term surface soil moisture data 2.1.1 Satellite-based surface soil moisture data products SMAP currently has the highest quality of all remotesensing-based soil moisture products (Al-Yaari et al, 2019) and is thus chosen as the primary training target. The SMAP Enhanced L3 Radiometer Global Daily 9 km EASE-Grid Soil Moisture V002 (SPL3SMP_E_002; hereinafter SMAP_E for short), which was developed by improving the spatial interpolation of the original 36 km resolution SMAP soil moisture data (Chan et al, 2018), was adopted in this study. SMAP_E was reprojected from the EASE-Grid 2.0 projection with 9 km resolution to the WGS 1984 geographic coordinate system with 0.1 • resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.1 Data for the production of global long-term surface soil moisture data 2.1.1 Satellite-based surface soil moisture data products SMAP currently has the highest quality of all remotesensing-based soil moisture products (Al-Yaari et al, 2019) and is thus chosen as the primary training target. The SMAP Enhanced L3 Radiometer Global Daily 9 km EASE-Grid Soil Moisture V002 (SPL3SMP_E_002; hereinafter SMAP_E for short), which was developed by improving the spatial interpolation of the original 36 km resolution SMAP soil moisture data (Chan et al, 2018), was adopted in this study. SMAP_E was reprojected from the EASE-Grid 2.0 projection with 9 km resolution to the WGS 1984 geographic coordinate system with 0.1 • resolution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang (2017) also found the large temporal inconsistency between existing global LAI products at a longer time scale [85]. Cammalleri (2019) found GEOV2 fAPAR showed a systematic overestimation of the fAPAR anomalies compared with the MODIS fAPAR and proposed a two-step harmonization procedure to remove this discrepancy [86]. However, the homogenization may alter the magnitude of the original fAPAR time series in an undesirable way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to delineate the drought impact and define the suboptimal conditions for crop growth, a specific threshold was selected for each of the calculated anomalies' time series [63]. In drought analysis in general a value of ±1 is often used to discriminate possible wet (positive anomalies) or dry (negative anomalies) conditions from the normal [11,35]. This value corresponded to suboptimal conditions and was used for the NDVI and ESI-based anomalies, while in the case of LST, the reverse was applied (possible wet (negative anomalies) or dry (positive anomalies).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%