2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonization of strategies for the validation of quantitative analytical procedures: A SFSTP proposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
196
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
196
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trueness, expressed in terms of relative bias (%), was calculated from the validation standards [16,24]. As can been seen in Table 1, trueness was acceptable (relative bias smaller than 10%) for both matrices serum and urine.…”
Section: Truenessmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Trueness, expressed in terms of relative bias (%), was calculated from the validation standards [16,24]. As can been seen in Table 1, trueness was acceptable (relative bias smaller than 10%) for both matrices serum and urine.…”
Section: Truenessmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It therefore refers to total measurement error. Trueness refers to "the closeness of agreement between the average value obtained from a large series of test results and an accepted reference value" [15,16,19]. This concept is therefore related to the systematic error of a measurement process.…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The validation samples mappings were then analyzed with the PLS model and the mean predicted concentration of each map was used to validate the model. This method has been validated using the "total error" approach in accordance with the validation requirements in the ICH Q2 R1 norm (Hubert et al, 2008(Hubert et al, , 2007a(Hubert et al, , 2007b(Hubert et al, , 2004.…”
Section: Quantitative Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%