“…7. From the figure it is clearly observed that the performance of proposed method is better of 15.2%, 12.8%, and 14.45% for image 1, 14.9%, 12.7%, and 14.7% for image 2, 15%, 12.77%, and 14.47% for image 3, and 15.43%, 13.8%, and 15.7% for image 4 when compared with Cui et al [17], Liao et al [21], Deepthi et al [22] research works. The analysis of encryption quality with various images is shown in Fig.…”