However, despite the recent success of ICB and CAR-T therapies in cancer clinical trials, these approaches still face limitations as only a small fraction of patients derive clinical benefit. [4] ICB therapy cannot prime the immune system to specifically recognize or target tumor cells. This approach only works on related inhibitory signaling pathways, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and exerts therapeutic efficacy when antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are already present. [5] Successful treatment outcomes will therefore require the identification of predictive biomarkers to ascertain if the host tumor will respond to ICB therapeutics administered. [6] Although CAR-T has seen remarkable success in hematological malignancies, response rates of patients with solid tumors remain low. [7] Clinical applications of CAR-T therapies are limited due to on-target/off-tumor toxicities and the need for predefined tumor antigen (Ag). [8] Notwithstanding, the marked progress of immunotherapy using ICB and CAR-T has seen a surge of reinvigorated interest in cancer vaccine development. [9] Cancer vaccines involve the administration of tumor Ags and/or adjuvants to train the immune system to recognize and attack tumor cells. [10] Although vaccines against infectious diseases have been one of the greatest medical accomplishments of modern medicine, the application of vaccines in cancer treatment has seen far lesser success, and, till date only few cancer vaccines have received approval for clinical use. [11] Given their Cancer vaccines aim at eliciting tumor-specific responses for the immune system to identify and eradicate malignant tumor cells while sparing the normal tissues. Furthermore, cancer vaccines can potentially induce long-term immunological memory for antitumor responses, preventing metastasis and cancer recurrence, thus presenting an attractive treatment option in cancer immunotherapy. However, clinical efficacy of cancer vaccines has remained low due to longstanding challenges, such as poor immunogenicity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, tumor heterogeneity, inappropriate immune tolerance, and systemic toxicity. Recently, bioinspired materials and biomimetic technologies have emerged to play a part in reshaping the field of cancer nanomedicine. By mimicking desirable chemical and biological properties in nature, bioinspired engineering of cancer vaccine delivery platforms can effectively transport therapeutic cargos to tumor sites, amplify antigen and adjuvant bioactivities, and enable spatiotemporal control and on-demand immunoactivation. As such, integration of biomimetic designs into delivery platforms for cancer vaccines can enhance efficacy while retaining good safety profiles, which contributes to expediting the clinical translation of cancer vaccines. Recent advances in bioinspired delivery platforms for cancer vaccines, existing obstacles faced, as well as insights and future directions for the field are discu...