Harnessing Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Enable Community-Oriented Primary Care

Abstract

Background: Despite growing acceptance and implementation of geographic information systems (GIS) in the public health arena, its utility for clinical population management and coordination by leaders in a primary care clinical health setting has been neither fully realized nor evaluated. Methods: In a primary care network of clinics charged with caring for vulnerable urban communities, we used GIS to (1) integrate and analyze clinical (practice management) data and population (census) data and (2) generate distribution, service area, and population penetration maps of those clinics. We then conducted qualitative evaluation of the responses of primary care clinic leaders, administrators, and community board members to analytic mapping of their clinic and regional population data. Results: Practice management data were extracted, geocoded, and mapped to reveal variation between actual clinical service areas and the medically underserved areas for which these clinics received funding, which was surprising to center leaders. In addition, population penetration analyses were performed to depict patterns of utilization. Qualitative assessments of staff response to the process of mapping clinical and population data revealed enthusiastic engagement in the process, which led to enhanced community comprehension, new ideas about data use, and an array of applications to improve their clinical revenue. However, they also revealed barriers to further adoption, including time, expense, and technical expertise, which could limit the use of GIS and mapping unless economies of scale across clinics, the use of web technology, and the availability of dynamic mapping tools could be realized. Conclusions: Analytic mapping was enthusiastically received and practically applied in the primary care setting, and was readily comprehended by clinic leaders for innovative purposes. This is a tool of particular relevance amid primary care safety-net expansion and increased funding of health information technology diffusion in these settings, particularly if the hurdles of cost and technological expertise are overcome by harnessing new advances in web-based mapping technology. (J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:22-31.) This article was externally peer reviewed.

Applying GIS Methods to Public Health Research at Harvard University

“…More recently, geographic analytic methods have been applied to the fields of chronic disease epidemiology and environmental health, to link proximity to exposures to incidence of non-communicable diseases. Application of GIS methods to public health research has also helped inform health care delivery and resource allocation (McLafferty 2003;Bazemore 2010;Gobalet 1996). GIS methods can support the summation of large amounts of data for disease surveillance and health reporting, identify new cases and at-risk populations, stratify risk factors, and quantify risk and transmission patterns.…”

Geographic Information System Oriented GIS Automatic Surveying and Mapping Technology

“…From the preliminary development period of the research experiment and local application to the practical and productive, the geographic information system provides the analysis and decision basis for the major problems of the national economy. After nearly 40 years of development, China's geographic information system has made significant progress [3][4][5]. The research and application of geographic information system has gone to industrialization.…”

Mapping Primary Care: Putting Our Patients in Context

“…Whereas Dulin et al 4,5 and Bazemore et al 6,7 used GIS technology to assess primary-care service delivery in urban areas, Booza et al 8 One of the most important contributions GIS technology and spatial analyses make to primary care is helping us better manage our service delivery and educational programs. Booza et al 8 report that the process evaluation they conducted highlighted important gaps in their recruitment of clinical preceptors.…”

“…Bazemore et al 6 describe how they used GIS to integrate practicederived patient data with area-level population data to generate maps depicting an urban FQCHC's patient distribution, population penetration, and service area. In a similar vein to that of Dulin et al, 4,5 Bazemore and colleagues involved the primary care clinicians at the center, clinic administrators, and community members in evaluating the results of this spatial analysis.…”