2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6cc03015g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing Lewis acidic open metal sites of metal–organic frameworks: the foremost route to achieve highly selective benzene sorption over cyclohexane

Abstract: π-Complexation triggered Lewis acid-base interactions between open metal sites (OMS) of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), and π-e(-) rich adsorptive benzene (Bz) is exploited to establish M-MOF-74 as the best Bz-selective MOF sorbent, marking the first report of utilizing OMS behind benzene/cyclohexane separation; a key advance from the energy-economy standpoint of industrial separation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of significant interest is the high preference for cyclohexane adsorption over benzene by CUB‐30 at low partial pressures. The separation of cyclohexane and benzene is a particularly important, energy intensive and expensive process due to their similar boiling points and kinetic diameters, 5.85 Å and 6.0 Å for benzene and cyclohexane, respectively (Figure S24) . The comparable boiling points excludes fractional distillation as an efficient separation process for these two chemicals, however adsorptive separation is an attractive alternative .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of significant interest is the high preference for cyclohexane adsorption over benzene by CUB‐30 at low partial pressures. The separation of cyclohexane and benzene is a particularly important, energy intensive and expensive process due to their similar boiling points and kinetic diameters, 5.85 Å and 6.0 Å for benzene and cyclohexane, respectively (Figure S24) . The comparable boiling points excludes fractional distillation as an efficient separation process for these two chemicals, however adsorptive separation is an attractive alternative .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparable boiling points excludes fractional distillation as an efficient separation process for these two chemicals, however adsorptive separation is an attractive alternative . Some MOFs have been investigated with this particular separation application goal, all providing MOFs selective for benzene adsorption in favour of cyclohexane . To the best of our knowledge, CUB‐30 is the first MOF material to show selective adsorption of cyclohexane over benzene, and as such broadens the scope for MOFs to be used in the removal of low concentrations of cyclohexane from mixed benzene/cyclohexane systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effective cyclohexane/benzene separation is one of the most important industrial processes to be optimized since a conventional vapor fractional separation is hampered by a similarity of the boiling points of these compounds [43]. A great potential of porous MOFs for the cyclohexane/benzene separation has been already demonstrated a number of times [44][45][46]. The small aperture of channels in 6, lined with aromatic functionalities can facilitate benzene extraction from the benzene/cyclohexane mixtures due to possible - stacking interactions.…”
Section: Benzene/cyclohexane Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%