2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing light energy with a planar transparent hybrid of graphene/single wall carbon nanotube/n-type silicon heterojunction solar cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a demonstrated VOC of 535 mV, the VOC of our p-(CuS)x:(ZnS)1-x / n-Si device is comparable to that of the best-in-class single-walled carbon nanotube / Si (530mV) 75 (where the reported VOC of SWCN/Si devices is within the range of 370-530mV) [42][43][44]46 and graphene / Si (540mV) 50 PV devices (where the reported VOC of graphene /Si device is within the range of 359-540mV). [47][48][49] Given that anti-reflection or light trapping was not considered in this cell, as can be seen from the reflectance spectrum in Figure 6c, various promising improvements can be envisioned.…”
Section: Electrical Properties As Indicated By Hall and Seebeck Coefmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a demonstrated VOC of 535 mV, the VOC of our p-(CuS)x:(ZnS)1-x / n-Si device is comparable to that of the best-in-class single-walled carbon nanotube / Si (530mV) 75 (where the reported VOC of SWCN/Si devices is within the range of 370-530mV) [42][43][44]46 and graphene / Si (540mV) 50 PV devices (where the reported VOC of graphene /Si device is within the range of 359-540mV). [47][48][49] Given that anti-reflection or light trapping was not considered in this cell, as can be seen from the reflectance spectrum in Figure 6c, various promising improvements can be envisioned.…”
Section: Electrical Properties As Indicated By Hall and Seebeck Coefmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, their fabrication process typically requires vacuum processing. Carbon nanotubes and graphene have also been employed and open circuit voltages up to 550 mV have been observed. Here, we investigated chemical-bath-deposited-(CuS) x :(ZnS) 1– x as a hole-selective contact to n-Si. Several proof-of-concept photovoltaic (PV) devices based on p-(CuS) x :(ZnS) 1– x /n-Si were fabricated, and observed optimal 1 sun V oc value of 535 mV and J sc value 21 mA/cm 2 , which suggests the potential for this material in photovoltaic devices and other optoelectronic devices.…”
Section: Synthesis Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mg(NO 3 ) 2 is commonly used to stabilise CNT suspensions for EPD; however, the inorganic contamination can block the catalytic sites and limit electron transfer to tri-iodide (I 3 − ) ions [178]. Alternatively, the combination of CNTs with RGO can produce composite coatings with a high conductivity and catalytic activity [163], for similar reasons as the hybrid EDLC electrodes discussed above. Further improvements can be obtained by adding a metal catalyst; for example, doping with Au nanoparticles increased the PCE from 6.2% to 8.8% for CNT/Au hybrid films [163].…”
Section: Fuel Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPD coatings on an, in principle re-usable, stainless steel anode can be transferred to a transparent substrate; for example, EPD CNT films hot-pressed onto to a poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) substrate showed strong adhesion, and the conductivity remained stable after >10,000 cycles of repeated bending [113]. Hybridisation, by co-deposition, can combine the areal coverage of graphene, with the network connectivity of CNTs, for improved TCF performance [163,164]. In an n-type Si heterojunction solar cell, PCE was nearly doubled for the hybrid compared to control devices using pure CNT or graphene films as current collectors [163].…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the adsorption capacity of MA molecules on the new adsorbents, adsorption isotherms of MA were measured on SE-C, Fe@C composites, and several typical adsorbents including two MOFs and a commercial activated carbon XFNANO C-AC (Table 1). 51 The experimental data were also fitted using Langmuir and Freundlich models given by eqs 8 and 9, 52 whereas the results are shown in Figure 5A,B and the fitted parameters are listed in Table 3.where Q m and Q e (mmol/g) are the maximum and equilibrium adsorption capacity and K L (L/mmol) is a constant related to the adsorption energy; K F (mmol (1–1/ n ) /g·L 1/ n ) is defined as the adsorption or distribution coefficient, and n is an indicator of the adsorption intensity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%