2016 IEEE International Test Conference (ITC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/test.2016.7805835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing process variations for optimizing wafer-level probe-test flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shift undermines the effectiveness of a simple stuck-at based test solution. Data-based classification algorithms have improved continuously with the change of defects, minimize yield loss [11,12,13,14,15,16,17], ML can be used to distinguish between marginal defects and process variation defects based on circuit delay, depend on different delay distribution. The classification results can be able to locate the defects and identify the root cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This shift undermines the effectiveness of a simple stuck-at based test solution. Data-based classification algorithms have improved continuously with the change of defects, minimize yield loss [11,12,13,14,15,16,17], ML can be used to distinguish between marginal defects and process variation defects based on circuit delay, depend on different delay distribution. The classification results can be able to locate the defects and identify the root cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], hidden characteristics of test data that make a correlation between dies and test items were investigated, but did not consider data overfitting. In [16], a wafer test flow was optimized with a graphical model and in [17], defect characteristics by wafer mapping were D e l e t e d investigated, but did not consider the marginal defects. A method in [18] predicts test results using Support Vector Machine (SVM) with a weighted dynamic time warping kernel function, but did not consider classification [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation