Harnessing the Electronic Health Care Record to Optimize Patient Safety in Primary Care: Framework for Evaluating e–Safety-Netting Tools

Abstract

The management of diagnostic uncertainty is part of every primary care physician’s role. e–Safety-netting tools help health care professionals to manage diagnostic uncertainty. Using software in addition to verbal or paper based safety-netting methods could make diagnostic delays and errors less likely. There are an increasing number of software products that have been identified as e–safety-netting tools, particularly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. e–Safety-netting tools can have a variety of functions, such as sending clinician alerts, facilitating administrative tasking, providing decision support, and sending reminder text messages to patients. However, these tools have not been evaluated by using robust research designs for patient safety interventions. We present an emergent framework of criteria for effective e–safety-netting tools that can be used to support the development of software. The framework is based on validated frameworks for electronic health record development and patient safety. There are currently no tools available that meet all of the criteria in the framework. We hope that the framework will stimulate clinical and public conversations about e–safety-netting tools. In the future, a validated framework would drive audits and improvements. We outline key areas for future research both in primary care and within integrated care systems.

What causes delays in diagnosing blood cancers? A rapid review of the evidence

“…Our typology also suggests that patients relating to our Typologies 2 and 3 may initially present with symptoms that they interpret as mild illness or an event-linked problem. Solutions may be found in systems that reduce the burden on HCPs and patients to support effective decision-making and appropriate reconsultation, such as electronic safety netting software and risk calculation tools, as well as specialist referral to non-specific symptom pathways (Black et al, 2022). Blood tests and investigations are crucial to blood cancer diagnosis, and access to these (as well as specialist advice) must be made available.…”

“…Additionally, some studies focused on several intervals, for example, Antel et al (2019), whereas other studies attempted to measure one interval, for example, Howell et al (2015). We noted that studies published after the Aarhus statement/MPT (Weller et al, 2012;Scott et al, 2013) which defined cancer delay intervals by discrete events such as time to first presentation, time to referral to secondary care and time to diagnosis, were more consistent in their reporting.…”

“…Two studies used the interval between symptom onset and diagnosis to measure delay, but there was variation in its definition, for example, one study defined delay as >30 days (Lins et al, 2012) where another used the distribution of diagnosis times to identify patients experiencing greater delays greater than the median (Friese et al, 2009). One study used the interval from first presentation to diagnosis, with a threshold of 6 weeks to define delay (Antel et al, 2019).…”

“…Multiple myeloma may incur longer delays than non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or Hodgkin's lymphomaDapkevičiūtė et al (2019)) Hodgkin's lymphoma can also be a predictor for delay compared to non-Hodgkin's lymphomaAntel et al (2019) Patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia may wait longer than patients with other blood cancer types to visit a doctorHowell et al (2015) Patient characteristics Patients who experienced delayed diagnosis of multiple myeloma were on average 1 year older Friese et al (2009) Black patients are more likely to have delayed diagnosis than white patients in multiple myeloma Friese et al (2009) Women are more likely to have a delayed diagnosis than men in multiple myeloma Friese et al (2009) Patients with co-morbidities are more likely to have a delayed diagnosis than patients without co-morbidities in multiple myeloma Friese et al (2009) Having three or more children is associated with greater diagnostic delay in leukaemia Lins et al (2012) Having a birth order of third or greater is associated with diagnostic delay in leukaemia Lins et al (2012) Health system factors Locum GP visit associated with delay Gibson et al (2013) Patients who are acutely ill are more likely to be referred Gibson et al (2013); Howell et al (2015) Plasma viscosity and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are the most indicative tests for myeloma Koshiaris et al (2018a); Koshiaris et al…”

Advancing leadership in surgery: a realist review of interventions and strategies to promote evidence-based leadership in healthcare

“…The timing of leadership interventions in surgical careers seems to be a key aspect to their effectiveness. Traditionally, the literature on the timing for the implementation of innovations and behavioural change interventions has focused on discrete events such as triggers to Acton [ 71 , 72 ]. However, the concept of timing in our review reflected timing relative to a surgical career trajectory, i.e.…”