1999
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/32/19/303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hartree-Fock treatment of exchange in (e,2e) collisions

Abstract: The distorted-wave Born approximation has been very successful for treating electron-impact ionization (e,2e) of heavy atoms for high-energy incident electrons. However, as the energy of the incident electrons approaches threshold, significant differences between experiment and theory are observed. In these calculations, the continuum projectile electron wavefunction is typically calculated using the static field of the atom plus a local approximation for electron exchange. While this approximation is believed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, puzzling discrepancies remain in particular outside the scattering plane [9,19]. For low-energy electron impact ionization, significant differences between experiment and theoretical predictions were observed even inside the scattering plane [20,21]. Outside the scattering plane, only a few experiments for low-energy electron collisions with heavier targets were carried out for equal energy sharing conditions and both finalstate electrons being emitted perpendicular to the incident beam [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, puzzling discrepancies remain in particular outside the scattering plane [9,19]. For low-energy electron impact ionization, significant differences between experiment and theoretical predictions were observed even inside the scattering plane [20,21]. Outside the scattering plane, only a few experiments for low-energy electron collisions with heavier targets were carried out for equal energy sharing conditions and both finalstate electrons being emitted perpendicular to the incident beam [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the agreement between theoretical predictions and experiment is found to be generally good concerning the relative shape, i.e., the angular dependence, of the cross sections, see e.g., Refs. [16][17][18]21,22]. One of the well-known outstanding issues in experiment, however, is the general lack of absolute cross-section data for ionization of the heavier targets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is no good simply ignoring it, for if we take Q͑͒ = 0, Eq. ͑36͒ admits only real solutions, regardless of the strength of the inelastic processes ͑as measured by ␥͒ or the value of p. Thus none of the oscillatory patterns of decay known to characterize this problem ͓e.g., in the Franck-Hertz experiment ͑Robson et al., 2000;Sigeneger et al, 2003͔͒ can be reproduced with such a drastic assumption. Likewise, neglecting heat flux in even the simple case of elastic collisions governed by a constant collision frequency ͑p =0, ␥ =1͒ leads to solutions of Eq.…”
Section: ͑36͒mentioning
confidence: 97%