2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3805459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hartz IV and the Decline of German Unemployment: A Macroeconomic Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critics, in turn, doubt the thesis of the positive labor market effects of the reforms and cite other reasons for the reduction in unemployment. (Macro)economic analyses of the reforms (e.g., Krebs andScheffel, 2013, 2017;Launov and Wälde, 2013;Hartung et al, 2018;Bradley and Kügler, 2019;Hochmuth et al, 2021) show that the reforms indeed played an important role for the decline in (structural) unemployment, but they are not the only explanatory factor for the positive labor market development.…”
Section: A2 Macroeconomic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Critics, in turn, doubt the thesis of the positive labor market effects of the reforms and cite other reasons for the reduction in unemployment. (Macro)economic analyses of the reforms (e.g., Krebs andScheffel, 2013, 2017;Launov and Wälde, 2013;Hartung et al, 2018;Bradley and Kügler, 2019;Hochmuth et al, 2021) show that the reforms indeed played an important role for the decline in (structural) unemployment, but they are not the only explanatory factor for the positive labor market development.…”
Section: A2 Macroeconomic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dustmann et al 2014, Hoffmann andLemieux 2016). (Macro)economic analyses of the Hartz reforms (e.g., Krebs and Scheffel, 2013;Launov and Wälde, 2013;Hartung et al, 2018;Bradley and Kügler, 2019;Hochmuth et al, 2021) show that the reforms did play an important role for the decline in unemployment, but other factors were also important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Launov and Wälde, 2016; Klinger and Weber, 2016; Hertweck and Sigrist, 2015), as well as lower separation rates (Hartung, Jung and Kuhn, 2018; Klinger and Weber, 2016). Some have argued that worsened outside options have increased the willingness of the unemployed to make concessions (Krebs and Scheffel, 2013) and have connected the social benefit reform to increased selection rates and vacancy postings (Hochmuth et al ., 2021). Others have pointed to a positive effect of moderate wages and flexible wage setting (Dustmann et al ., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… There are several reasons for this improvement: Some economists credit the 2003–2006 labor market reforms (“Hartz reforms”) and the short‐time work program (Gehrke, Lechthaler, and Merkl (2019)), while others claim that the combination of flexible collective bargaining institutions and restructuring of supply chains were the driving forces (e.g., Dustmann, Fitzenberger, Schönberg, and Spitz‐Oener (2014), Hoffmann and Lemieux (2016)). (Macro)economic analyses of the Hartz reforms (e.g., Krebs and Scheffel (2013), Launov and Wälde (2013), Hartung, Jung, and Kuhn (2018), Bradley and Kügler (2019), Hochmuth, Kohlbrecher, Merkl, and Gartner (2021)) show that the reforms did play an important role for the decline in unemployment, but other factors were also important. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%