2003
DOI: 10.4141/p02-067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harvest time and N fertilization effects on forage yield and quality of quackgrass (Elytrigia repens L.) in northeastern Saskatchewan

Abstract: Beauv.] is a primary noxious weed, but some cattle producers are discovering its value as forage for early-season grazing and for winter feeding as hay. Little information is available on how its production and quality change with advancing maturity and on its response to improved management in the Parkland zone of the Canadian prairies. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of harvest date and N fertilizer (surface-broadcast ammonium nitrate at 0, 56, 112 and 168 kg N ha -1 ) on the forage … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The total DM yields obtained in fertilized plots after 12 wk (4.0–4.2 Mg ha −1 and 6.7–7.5 Mg ha −1 in the Bromus – Poa and Pleum – Lolium hayfields, respectively) is comparable with average yields (2.5–10 Mg ha −1 ) obtained for other cool season perennial grasses in northeastern North America (Durr et al, 2005; Malhi et al, 2003; Cherney et al, 2002; Griffin et al, 2002; Ziadi et al, 2000; Madakadze et al, 1999). Although these hayfields were considered unimproved and under‐utilized, they had moderate to high soil fertility and produced 3.4 to 4.7 Mg ha −1 in unfertilized plots, which is comparable to yields obtained in other fertilized fields in this region (Durr et al, 2005; Griffin et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The total DM yields obtained in fertilized plots after 12 wk (4.0–4.2 Mg ha −1 and 6.7–7.5 Mg ha −1 in the Bromus – Poa and Pleum – Lolium hayfields, respectively) is comparable with average yields (2.5–10 Mg ha −1 ) obtained for other cool season perennial grasses in northeastern North America (Durr et al, 2005; Malhi et al, 2003; Cherney et al, 2002; Griffin et al, 2002; Ziadi et al, 2000; Madakadze et al, 1999). Although these hayfields were considered unimproved and under‐utilized, they had moderate to high soil fertility and produced 3.4 to 4.7 Mg ha −1 in unfertilized plots, which is comparable to yields obtained in other fertilized fields in this region (Durr et al, 2005; Griffin et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As would be expected, fertilizer application tended to improve total yield and quality of forage hay in this study. Other studies have found greater yield increases with the addition of fertilizer [2]. The low response to fertilizer in this study can be contributed to good soil nutrient status and the contribution of fixed N from the alfalfa in the alfalfa-bromegrass mixture.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…Acid detergent fibre consists mainly of cellulose and lignin. Malhi et al (2003) noted that the ADF concentration for a one-time cutting of quack grass ( Elytrigia repens L.) was not affected by ammonium nitrate N fertilization ranging from 0–168 kg/ha. A slight decrease in ADF was seen for ammonium nitrate fertilization and two cuttings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acid detergent fibre consists mainly of cellulose and lignin. Malhi et al (2003) noted that the ADF N, nitrogen; IVDMD, in vitro dry matter disappearance; GP 72 , cumulative gas production at 72 h; A, asymptotic gas production; AGPR, average gas production rate when half of asymptotic gas production occurred; c, constant fractional rate; T 1/2 , the time when half of asymptotic gas production occurred; CO 2 , carbon dioxide; CH 4 , methane; H 2 , hydrogen gas; NS, not significant. * Diluted buffered rumen fluids (75 ml) were incubated for 72 h with 500-mg ground substrate, and the number of observations used in the statistical analysis for each urea N fertilizing level was n = 18.…”
Section: Influence Of Nitrogen Fertilization On Nutrient Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 99%