“…At the same time, on the supply side, these nutrients need to be brought to the agricultural sector and/or urban agriculture (UA) where food consumed in the city is being produced, causing negative impacts, particularly resource depletion (i.e., phosphorus) and indirect energy consumption (i.e., artificial nitrogen fertilizer production) [3][4][5][6].Alternative destinations for these outflows can be found, such as: City green spaces, accelerated regeneration of natural disaster sites (fires, floods), erosion-prone hillsides in the city, selling the nutrients to external buyers, and/or for UA [5,7]. In particular, UA is a suitable and increasingly popular destination for recovered nutrients as it allows for closing cycles locally, reducing transport distances for residues, fertilizers, and food, offering many advantages for citizens (e.g., increased green space), and avoiding fossil-based artificial fertilizers (see [7]). Despite the potential for closing nutrient, water, or energy flows, in practice, the implications of closing cycles in urban systems is not evident, due in part to the lack of information about the possibilities in matching demand and supply considering the quantity and quality of flows, its time and space availability, as well as user practices and disposition for changing household practices.Circular economy is gaining attention in Chile, both at private and public institutions.…”