2019
DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2019.1624573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harvesting of Arthrospira platensis with helicoidal and straight trichomes using filtration and centrifugation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harvesting efficiency of A. platensis BEA 1257B at a constant flow rate of 750 L/h onto a vibrating 40 µm stainless-steel net with 0.5 m 2 surface is reported in Table A2, Appendix B. Filter retention varied between 74.4 ± 4.7 and 82.1 ± 2.8% (mean value: 78.7 ± 3.3%), which is in line with the values reported for vibrating screens and for static woven nylon filters of the same mesh size operated with Arthrospira [26,37]. Conversely, the constant filtration flux applied in this study (1.5 m 3 /m 2 /h, limited by the technical characteristics of the pump) was approximately three times lower than those reported in the previous studies [26,37]. The harvesting efficiency depended on the culture densities (r = 0.99, p < 0.01), as a result of the partial clogging of the filter occurring at high cell concentration.…”
Section: Culture Productivity and Harvesting Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Harvesting efficiency of A. platensis BEA 1257B at a constant flow rate of 750 L/h onto a vibrating 40 µm stainless-steel net with 0.5 m 2 surface is reported in Table A2, Appendix B. Filter retention varied between 74.4 ± 4.7 and 82.1 ± 2.8% (mean value: 78.7 ± 3.3%), which is in line with the values reported for vibrating screens and for static woven nylon filters of the same mesh size operated with Arthrospira [26,37]. Conversely, the constant filtration flux applied in this study (1.5 m 3 /m 2 /h, limited by the technical characteristics of the pump) was approximately three times lower than those reported in the previous studies [26,37]. The harvesting efficiency depended on the culture densities (r = 0.99, p < 0.01), as a result of the partial clogging of the filter occurring at high cell concentration.…”
Section: Culture Productivity and Harvesting Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…During F phase, harvesting parameters were determined as follows: Filtration flux was determined as the volume of culture passing the filter area over time [37]:…”
Section: Harvesting Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, linear A. platensis filaments could be harvested at around 85% efficiency at 4000 x g for 10 min, in a laboratoryscale fixed angle rotor centrifuge. In contrast helical A. platensis filaments showed poor harvesting yield (around 50%) even at 9000 x g (Cuellar-Bermudez et al, 2019). S. obliquus cells could be removed from the culture by centrifugation at 3000 x g for 10 min, in a 750W TD5A centrifuge, with a harvest efficiency of 99.3% (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: 3 Centrifugationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Gravity-driven dead-end filtration through 5 μm nylon membranes was enough to achieve > 90% harvesting efficiency of A. platensis cultures. Pumped filtration additionally increased the filtration flux up to 20 m 3 m −2 h −1 enabling a faster process (Cuellar-Bermudez et al, 2019). The flux of typical membrane filtration processes can be considerably smaller.…”
Section: Membrane Filtrationmentioning
confidence: 99%