Has Gavi lived up to its promise? Quasi-experimental evidence on country immunisation rates and child mortality

Abstract

IntroductionGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, was set up in 2000 to improve access to vaccines for children living in the poorest countries. Funding has increased significantly over time, with Gavi disbursements reaching US $1.58 billion in 2015. We assess whether Gavi’s funding programmes have indeed increased immunisation coverage in 51 recipient countries for two key vaccines for 12–23 month olds: combined diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus (DPT) and measles. Additionally, we look at effects on infant and child mortality.MethodsTaking a difference-in-differences quasi-experimental approach to observational data, we estimate the impact of Gavi eligibility on immunisation coverage and mortality rates over time, using WHO/UNICEF figures covering 1995–2016. We control for economy size and population of each country as well as running a suite of robustness checks and sensitivity tests.ResultsWe find large and significant positive effects from Gavi’s funding programmes: on average a 12.02 percentage point increase in DPT immunisation coverage (95% CI 6.56 to 17.49) and an 8.81 percentage point increase in measles immunisation coverage (95% CI 3.58 to 14.04) over the period to 2016. Our estimates show Gavi support also induced 6.22 fewer infant deaths (95% CI −10.47 to −1.97) and 12.23 fewer under-five deaths (95% CI −19.66 to −4.79) per 1000 live births.ConclusionOur findings provide evidence that Gavi has had a substantial impact on the fight against communicable diseases for improved population and child health in lower-income countries. In this case, the health policy to verticalise aid—specifically development assistance for health—via a specialised global fund has had positive outcomes.

Integrating pharmaceutical systems strengthening in the current global health scenario: three ‘uncomfortable truths’

“…5 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA. 6 National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control, Abuja, Nigeria.…”

“…Noncommunicable diseases such as cancer, strokes, chronic respiratory infections, hypertension, and diabetes are responsible for more than 32 million deaths per year in LMICs [2]. Global health programmes and partnerships such as the Global Fund and The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) have been tremendously successful in mobilising resources and scaling up treatment for communicable diseases [3][4][5][6]. However, these initiatives are unsustainable in the absence of donor support and insufficient for tackling the challenges that come with the triple transition.…”

Will anti-vaccine activism in the USA reverse global goals?

“…A central concern is whether anti-vaccine activism from the USA will detrimentally effect the world’s low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). For two decades, under the auspices of the ‘Global Goals’ (initially the ‘Millennium Development Goals’ followed by ‘Sustainable Development Goals’), tremendous strides have been made in reducing deaths and morbidity from measles, polio, pertussis and other dangerous illnesses that can be prevented by vaccination 5 . The fear is that globalizing anti-vaccine activism might reverse these trends.…”

Insight into Nigeria’s progress towards the universal coverage of reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health services: a secondary data analysis

“…The improvement might be due to the high investments in immunisation programmes, mainly through the efforts of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, which fosters equal access to vaccines for populations living in the world's low-resource and high-burden countries like Nigeria. [68][69][70] According to the WHO and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) report, the group of 'Gavi countries' has substantially reduced its gap in immunisation coverage with the rest of the world since the start of 2015 to 2020 strategic period. 69 However, it is essential to note that while DTP3 immunisation coverage increased after UHC adoption, the trend analysis shows a decline of 12.0% points from 54.0% in 2010 to 42.0% in 2015, which implies that the increase after the policy adoption year is trivial.…”