2004
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.1.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has hypodontia increased in Caucasians during the 20th century? A meta-analysis

Abstract: It has been claimed that agenesis of permanent teeth has increased over the years. The present study tested this hypothesis in Caucasians. Published data on the prevalence of children with one or more congenitally missing permanent teeth were selected on the basis of strictly imposed criteria. Using a meta-analysis, the data were evaluated and presented chronologically. Furthermore, the selected publications were checked for differences in the prevalence of agenesis between the male and female populations. Fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
150
2
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
150
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8 Dental agenesis has been reported to be the most common anomaly in the development of the human dentition and the prevalence of hypodontia varies greatly from 0.03% to 10.1% in various populations. 24 This can be attributed to different sample sizes, testing methods, geographic locations, and subject ages and ethnicities. Our results showed that hypodontia is the second most common type of anomalies among Saudi orthodontic patients, and the most commonly affected teeth were the upper lateral incisors followed by the lower second premolars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,8 Dental agenesis has been reported to be the most common anomaly in the development of the human dentition and the prevalence of hypodontia varies greatly from 0.03% to 10.1% in various populations. 24 This can be attributed to different sample sizes, testing methods, geographic locations, and subject ages and ethnicities. Our results showed that hypodontia is the second most common type of anomalies among Saudi orthodontic patients, and the most commonly affected teeth were the upper lateral incisors followed by the lower second premolars.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general population, the prevalence of congenital missing teeth has been reported to range from 3% to 10% of the subjects examined. 26,27 Studies of subjects with clefts, by contrast, have found the prevalence of missing teeth to range from 18% to 30%, and missing teeth was found to occur approximately three times as frequently on the cleft side as on the noncleft side. [28][29][30][31][32][33] In the present study, 16 of the 36 subjects (44.5%) had missing permanent lateral incisors in the cleft region and 5 of the 36 subjects (13.9%) had missing teeth outside the cleft region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the available data are not sufficient to support this assumption (Mattheeuws et al 2004), further research is necessary to unveil whether this trend was due to more accurate techniques and patient awareness, or whether humans are dealing with a real ten- online, has indicated that MSX1 and PAX9 combined association scored 0.995, which is the highest score among presented proteins, meaning that they are highly correlated.…”
Section: Current and Future Therapeutic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%