2005
DOI: 10.1142/s0219868105000410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HAS SFAS 133 MADE DERIVATIVES REPORTING MORE TRANSPARENT? A LOOK AT THE DOW-JONES 30

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of the percentage disclosure index is shown for all sectors in Table 4 IFRS 7 was associated with a 17% increase in the overall percentage of FI-related items disclosed; it grew from 30% of items required to be disclosed pre-IFRS 7 to 47% of items required to be published after IFRS 7 was adopted. In general, the findings of the current study are consistent with the notion that the new accounting standard put pressure on companies to publish more information in order to meet the needs of financial statement users including capital market participants (Chalmers and Godfrey, 2004;Chalmers, 2001;Hamlen and Largay, 2005).…”
Section: An Analysis Of Financial Instruments Disclosure By Industriasupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A summary of the percentage disclosure index is shown for all sectors in Table 4 IFRS 7 was associated with a 17% increase in the overall percentage of FI-related items disclosed; it grew from 30% of items required to be disclosed pre-IFRS 7 to 47% of items required to be published after IFRS 7 was adopted. In general, the findings of the current study are consistent with the notion that the new accounting standard put pressure on companies to publish more information in order to meet the needs of financial statement users including capital market participants (Chalmers and Godfrey, 2004;Chalmers, 2001;Hamlen and Largay, 2005).…”
Section: An Analysis Of Financial Instruments Disclosure By Industriasupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In conclusion, the general findings of the extant FI-related disclosure literature indicate that the introduction of new accounting standards have resulted in: (i) an increase in the number of companies supplying FI disclosure (Edwards and Eller, 1995;Chalmers and Godfrey, 2004;Chalmers, 2001;Hassan et al, 2006b); and (ii) an improvement in the level of corporate FI disclosure provided (Roulstone, 1999;Chalmers and Godfrey, 2000;Chalmers, 2001;Dunne et al, 2004;Woods and Marginson, 2004;Hamlen and Largay, 2005;Lopes and Rodrigues, 2006;Strouhal, 2009;Murcia and Santos, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, the investigations use different sample sizes ranging from a few companies with only ten annual reports (Edwards and Eller, 1995) to the inclusion of 600 firms (Gebhardt, 2012). In addition, some of the studies are sector-specific -concentrating on banking (Edwards and Eller, 1995), industrial companies (Hamlen and Largay, 2005) or firms from the manufacturing industry (Hamlen and Largay, 2005). Others are more general and include both financial and non-financial firms Rodrigues, 2006, 2008).…”
Section: Risk Disclosures Associated With Financial Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the existence of the FI-related accounting standards (before 1990), studies indicated that firms were hesitant to voluntarily disclose information about the use of FIs (Mahoney and Kawamura, 1995;Berkman et al, 1997;Grant and Marshall, 1997). However, after the introduction of FI-related accounting standards (IAS 32;IAS 30), research in the field of accounting and finance has examined their impact on the extent of FI disclosure (e.g., Roulstone, 1999;Chalmers and Godfrey, 2000;Chalmers, 2001;Dunne et al, 2004;Hamlen and Largay, 2005;Lopes and Rodrigues, 2006;Strouhal, 2009;Murcia andSantos, 2010, Tahat et al, 2016). Their results indicate that the extent of FI-related disclosure level was inconsistent across countries and years in developed and developing nations with poor FI disclosure in evolving markets 1 (Hamlen and Largay, 2005;Strouhal, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, after the introduction of FI-related accounting standards (IAS 32;IAS 30), research in the field of accounting and finance has examined their impact on the extent of FI disclosure (e.g., Roulstone, 1999;Chalmers and Godfrey, 2000;Chalmers, 2001;Dunne et al, 2004;Hamlen and Largay, 2005;Lopes and Rodrigues, 2006;Strouhal, 2009;Murcia andSantos, 2010, Tahat et al, 2016). Their results indicate that the extent of FI-related disclosure level was inconsistent across countries and years in developed and developing nations with poor FI disclosure in evolving markets 1 (Hamlen and Largay, 2005;Strouhal, 2009). Prior studies suggested that institutional contexts (e.g., the culture, economy, the legal system and religion) could have a significant impact on corporate FI disclosure (Lopes and Rodrigues, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%