2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33712-3_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has My Algorithm Succeeded? An Evaluator for Human Pose Estimators

Abstract: Abstract. Most current vision algorithms deliver their output 'as is', without indicating whether it is correct or not. In this paper we propose evaluator algorithms that predict if a vision algorithm has succeeded. We illustrate this idea for the case of Human Pose Estimation (HPE). We describe the stages required to learn and test an evaluator, including the use of an annotated ground truth dataset for training and testing the evaluator (and we provide a new dataset for the HPE case), and the development of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the recent work of [19] we select the best component with the minimal uncertainty in the marginal posterior distributions of the body parts. The criteria used to measure the uncertainty is given by s(k, I) = ∑ …”
Section: Minimum Variance (Min-var)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the recent work of [19] we select the best component with the minimal uncertainty in the marginal posterior distributions of the body parts. The criteria used to measure the uncertainty is given by s(k, I) = ∑ …”
Section: Minimum Variance (Min-var)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We encode the uncertainty in pose estimation by computing the L2 norm of the covariance matrix corresponding to the strongest mode in the marginal posterior distribution of each part in each view. This is the same criteria as used for component selection in [1] and is similar to the features used in [11]. 3.…”
Section: Confident Examples Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various approaches for estimating the confidence of the pose prediction have been considered in the literature, ranging from models that are discriminatively trained for both detection and pose estimation [18] to specialized methods that estimate confidence based on the combination of features as a post-processing step [11]. In this paper we follow the direction similar to [11] but also employ features based on the 3D pose reconstruction, which we find to be highly effective for filtering out incorrect pose estimates. Overall we make the following contributions.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…human-annotated data [3]- [5] or precision instrumentation [6]- [9]. These external sources of feedback which are not available during normal operation are known as "ground truth".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%