2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.126.041305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has NANOGrav Found First Evidence for Cosmic Strings?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
162
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
14
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unequivocally, GW probe of BSM models has become more interesting after the new NANOGrav analysis of 12.5 yrs pulsar timing data [91] which reports a strong evidence for a stochastic common-spectrum process and may be interpreted as a GW signal at frequency f ∼ 1/yr. The new data is better fitted with cosmic string models [92][93][94] than the single value power spectral density as suggested by the models of supermassive black hole (SMBHs). For the other interpretations of the NANOGrav data, e.g., primordial black holes, dark phase transition and inflation please see refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Unequivocally, GW probe of BSM models has become more interesting after the new NANOGrav analysis of 12.5 yrs pulsar timing data [91] which reports a strong evidence for a stochastic common-spectrum process and may be interpreted as a GW signal at frequency f ∼ 1/yr. The new data is better fitted with cosmic string models [92][93][94] than the single value power spectral density as suggested by the models of supermassive black hole (SMBHs). For the other interpretations of the NANOGrav data, e.g., primordial black holes, dark phase transition and inflation please see refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A few months ago, the NANOGrav collaboration has reported evidence for a stochastic process at nanohertz frequencies [31], which has been interpreted as SGWB in a large number of recent papers. Possible cosmological interpretations include stable [32,33] as well as metastable strings [34]. In the latter case an analysis of the NANOGrav data deduced a monopole-string-tension ratio in the range 7.8 ≤ √ κ ≤ 9.0 (2σ CL).…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)168mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These methods have not yet yielded clear results [60,61], although the results are expected in the next 2-5 years.…”
Section: Search By Cmb Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 97%