1997
DOI: 10.1080/13557858.1997.9961812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has psychological distress among UK South Asians been under‐estimated? A comparison of three measures in the west of Scotland population

Abstract: Clinical measures may have under-estimated distress in several South Asian groups. The results may be due to a preference for a particular language of emotion in the affected groups or to a higher frequency of stressful situations which provoke distinctive reactions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If these high and low scores are indeed a true reflection of mental health, our data might concur with other research indicating worse mental health for migrant populations who have lived longest in the host country [17], [23]. However, data on the mental health of various ethnic minority groups living in the UK is far from congruent, with some surveys indicating a higher burden of distress among Indian [23], [44], Pakistani [9], [23], [44][46] and Asian women [12], others that South Asian women have less burden of illness [17], still others finding few differences in prevalence between Punjabi or White primary care attendees [47]. Explanations for differences include poor standardisation of screening and diagnostic instruments for cross-cultural use [17], [48], variation in classification of ethnic groups [49], and the consideration that the interaction between cultural, racial and ethnic identity might differ during the process of acculturation for individuals and populations [50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…If these high and low scores are indeed a true reflection of mental health, our data might concur with other research indicating worse mental health for migrant populations who have lived longest in the host country [17], [23]. However, data on the mental health of various ethnic minority groups living in the UK is far from congruent, with some surveys indicating a higher burden of distress among Indian [23], [44], Pakistani [9], [23], [44][46] and Asian women [12], others that South Asian women have less burden of illness [17], still others finding few differences in prevalence between Punjabi or White primary care attendees [47]. Explanations for differences include poor standardisation of screening and diagnostic instruments for cross-cultural use [17], [48], variation in classification of ethnic groups [49], and the consideration that the interaction between cultural, racial and ethnic identity might differ during the process of acculturation for individuals and populations [50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“… 24 The distress reported by our respondents reinforces concern that significant psychological ill health amongst South Asian communities may exist but go unnoticed 8 . 25 , 26 Whilst respondents were receptive to neutral listening, most sought more active socially orientated support. This may add to current debate about the lack of sustained benefit from counselling alone in those at risk of mental ill health 27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents' perceptions of primary health care professionals may explain why some South Asians might appear less willing to declare psychological problems to GPs 34 . They may add to the debate about somatization of distress amongst South Asians 26 and its possible implications for under‐detection of psychological ill health 34 . 35 Concepts of health and illness may differ between cultures and communication difficulties may occur when assessing someone of another culture, particularly if compounded by language barriers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among female subjects, there are significant British Asian advantages at age 14-15 in limiting illness and chronic phlegm, which were not present in the mainly migrant group at age 30-40, and the migrant group's substantial disadvantage in self rated health (probably influenced by high levels of psychological distress) 17 has disappeared. On the other hand a significant advantage in the migrant group's experience of accidents is also no longer present.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%