2017
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has the epidemic of allergic contact dermatitis due to methylisothiazolinone reached its peak?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this regulatory action, a decline of the incidence of MI contact allergy was expected. Indeed, some single‐centre data or national contact allergy network data indicated that 2013/14 was probably the peak in the MI contact allergy epidemic, and a more or less marked decline was seen thereafter. For instance, in Australia MI had been banned from leave‐on cosmetic products, and a decline of MI sensitization frequency in consecutive patients was noted in 2017, which suggests some pre‐emptive measures, reducing exposure already before the regulatory deadline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this regulatory action, a decline of the incidence of MI contact allergy was expected. Indeed, some single‐centre data or national contact allergy network data indicated that 2013/14 was probably the peak in the MI contact allergy epidemic, and a more or less marked decline was seen thereafter. For instance, in Australia MI had been banned from leave‐on cosmetic products, and a decline of MI sensitization frequency in consecutive patients was noted in 2017, which suggests some pre‐emptive measures, reducing exposure already before the regulatory deadline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI) is a preservative commonly used in cosmetic products, including sunscreen 32 . Both MCI/MI and MI have caused an epidemic of allergic contact dermatitis 33 . However, MCI/MI or MI alone has hardly been reported to cause photoaggravated reactions or photoallergic reactions 34,35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Most of the published studies covered the period 2010 to 2015 or parts of it, where sensitization rates were high (>7%). [2][3][4][5][6][7]26,27 The peak of the epidemic was reached in 2013/14 17 and a decline noted for 2014/15. 16 Reports on the further development (2016-2018) are, however, sparse.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety of the European Commission (SCCS), as well as Cosmetics Europe (the association of the cosmetic industry) recommended that MI be banned from use in leave-on cosmetics in 2013. The overall frequency of sensitization decreased thereafter but remained at a high level, 16,17 for which continued occupational exposure, rinse-off or household products, still too high use concentrations, and undisclosed occurrence in a variety of products were thought to be responsible. 2,[18][19][20][21] We wondered whether the changes in the course of the epidemic were reflected in changes of the characteristics of patients in the surveil-…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%