2006
DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfl030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has the National Do Not Call Registry Helped or Hurt State-Level Response Rates?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this study was undertaken more than 10 years after the referenced studies, a period when a decline in response rates to all forms of surveys has been a major concern of researchers. The achieved rate is substantially higher than other studies have found for mailed surveys in the last decade [13,37,47]. In a review of 141 academic papers describing 175 separate studies published in management and behavioral sciences in the years 1975, 1985 and 1995, an average response rate of 55.6% was estimated [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, this study was undertaken more than 10 years after the referenced studies, a period when a decline in response rates to all forms of surveys has been a major concern of researchers. The achieved rate is substantially higher than other studies have found for mailed surveys in the last decade [13,37,47]. In a review of 141 academic papers describing 175 separate studies published in management and behavioral sciences in the years 1975, 1985 and 1995, an average response rate of 55.6% was estimated [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The implementation of the Canadian National ‘Do Not Call List’ just prior to the start of this study in 2008 may have had an impact on response rates (although research surveys are exempt from the registry); however, Link et al. 24 found no significant impact on response rates after a similar registry was implemented in the USA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…First, the cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inferences. Since BRFSS is a telephone based survey, there is the possibility of non-response bias (Link et al, 2006a, b). In addition, there may be medical advice recall bias especially given that we included in our analyses some participants who had last seen their health care provider as long as 24 months prior to their BRFSS interview.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%