1977
DOI: 10.1177/002221947701000614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Has the Perceptual Deficit Hypothesis Led Us Astray?

Abstract: This article gives a critique of current practice in the field of learning disabilities and examines several popular approaches to remediating educationally handicapped children. Various rationales underlying these approaches are analyzed in relation to recent research findings, with particular emphasis given to perceptual deficit models of learning disability. It is concluded that there is no foundation for many assumptions underlying assessment and treatment practices which pervade the field of learning disa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
4

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
27
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Young children may have had difficulties putting their pencils exactly at the position they planned due to not fully developed motor skills. Although several studies (e.g., Vellutino, Steger, Moyer, Harding, & Niles, 1977) did not find support for this motor deficit hypothesis, the test leaders' observations in the present study mentioned some important differences in motor skills, which may have introduced nuisance in the observed estimation locations of young children.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Young children may have had difficulties putting their pencils exactly at the position they planned due to not fully developed motor skills. Although several studies (e.g., Vellutino, Steger, Moyer, Harding, & Niles, 1977) did not find support for this motor deficit hypothesis, the test leaders' observations in the present study mentioned some important differences in motor skills, which may have introduced nuisance in the observed estimation locations of young children.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…In this case reading rate becomes a measure of fluency-a dynamic rapid visual-processing task. So whilst Vellutino suggested that theories of visual deficits were lacking theoretical foundation, and were unlikely to explain reading disability operationally at that time (Vellutino et al, 1977), more recent advances in understandings of the visual system have provided researchers with a more specific theoretical basis for the role of visual processing and visual attention in dyslexia.…”
Section: Visual Deficitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of such research focuses on how visual skill might enhance reading skill, and these results are quite mixed across orthographies. There is general agreement that pure visual skill is not likely a core cause of reading across orthographies (e.g., Goswami, 2004;Vellutino, Steger, Moyer, Harding, & Niles, 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%