Has Trump Damaged the U.S. Image Abroad? Decomposing the Effects of Policy Messages on Foreign Public Opinion

Abstract

The U.S. President Donald Trump has frequently made foreign countries central to his political messages, often conveying animosity. But do foreign citizens react more to the speaker of these messages-Trump himself-or their content? More generally, when people are exposed to messages sent from foreign countries, are their attitudes influenced by information heuristics or information content in messages? Although related studies are abundant in the literature of American public opinion, these questions are not fully examined in the literature of foreign public opinion. To address them, we used Japan as a case and fielded a survey experiment exposing citizens to U.S. policy messages that varied by source, policy content, and issue salience. Results suggest that while the source cue (Trump attribution) causes negative perceptions of the U.S., the policy content (cooperative vs. uncooperative) has a larger effect in shaping opinion of the U.S. Furthermore, analysis of interaction effects shows that only when U.S. policy approach is uncooperative does the Trump attribution have significantly negative and large effects. We conclude that foreign citizens rely more on policy content in transnational opinion formation-an aspect that past research in this area has overlooked.Substantively, these findings may demonstrate that even under a presidency that has alienated foreign countries and seemingly undermined U.S. stature in the world, foreign opinion toward the U.S. does not hinge entirely on its political leader. In short, Trump has not irreparably damaged U.S. image abroad.

Does Public Diplomacy Sway Foreign Public Opinion? Identifying the Effect of High-Level Visits

“…An alternative approach uses survey experiments, which offer better insights into the causal link between specific messages from foreign leaders and public opinion outcomes. Existing studies find that the effects of foreign leaders' messages are contingent on the content of the message, as well as feelings toward the leader, familiarity, and nationality (e.g., Agadjanian and Horiuchi 2020;Balmas 2018;Dragojlovic 2015). However, these findings are predicated on the assumption that leaders' publicdiplomacy efforts reach foreign publics in a form that is similar to what respondents experience on the survey.…”

The January 6 Insurrection and America's Standing Abroad: Natural Experimental Evidence from Five Unexpectedly Interrupted Public Opinion Surveys

“…power theories in International Relations, something that has proven notoriously difficult to do (Goldsmith and Horiuchi, 2012). Last, the paper adds additional causal evidence in support of the work of Agadjanian and Horiuchi (2020), Bateson and Weintraub (Forthcoming) , Carreras, Visconti and Acácio (Forthcoming), and Goldsmith and Horiuchi (2012), which suggests that the content of foreign policy and the identity of the president of the US strongly affects foreign approval of US leadership.…”

“…9 In this case the identity of the president and the content of foreign policy arguably both changed with the replacement of Donald Trump by Joe Biden, making it difficult to cleanly separate these two distinct mechanisms. Agadjanian and Horiuchi (2020) attempt to decompose the effect of the content of foreign policy and the identity of the US president using a survey experiment. They find that both matter but that the content of foreign policy matters more.…”

The impact of foreign public evaluations of the US Presidents on the favorability toward the country

“…Agadjanian and Horiuchi (2020) demonstrated that President Trump fosters negative perceptions of the US by examining Japanese public opinion. However, the study argues that the policy content (cooperative v. uncooperative) had a larger impact on shaping opinion of the US than the source cue (Trump attribution).…”