2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2007.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hash-based proximity clustering for efficient load balancing in heterogeneous DHT networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 6.1 presented a way of clustering in Cycloid. Readers are referred to [16] for its generalization to other DHT networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 6.1 presented a way of clustering in Cycloid. Readers are referred to [16] for its generalization to other DHT networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second method is to measure the service load, including, e.g. the number of service requests, routed messages, the size of stored items, maintenance signalling or the total volume of the traffic (Shen & Xu 2008, Bianchi et al 2006. The relation between the load types can be described as follows; service load generates hardware load and the impact depends on the hardware capabilities of the device in question.…”
Section: Basic Load Balancing Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done in order to maximize performance (Ferrari & Zhou 1987) and efficiency (Zhu & Hu 2004 of a distributed computer system by harnessing all available resources in the system, and to eliminate traffic bottlenecks (Shen & Xu 2008). The need for load balancing grows along with the overall load of a distributed computer system, since the probability of nodes getting overloaded grows.…”
Section: Basic Load Balancing Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of peer-to-peer systems, data migration can be further classified in the node virtualization [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] and one ID per server [1], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] strategies. In the former, every actual server can host a number of virtual servers which are responsible for small disjoint ranges of its items, and balancing is performed by moving virtual servers between actual ones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In current bibliography, a variety of methods exists focusing on achieving efficient load-balancing for such structures, whether they utilize the notion of "virtual servers" [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] or not [1], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. Yet, they can be categorized in two general strategies: Node Migration and Neighbor Item Exchange.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%