2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93040-4_57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HashAlign: Hash-Based Alignment of Multiple Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many graph matching and alignment algorithms have been developed in research domains ranging from bioinformatics to multimedia information retrieval [11]. Such algorithms can be based on graph kernels [17], node and edge embeddings [14], or hashing [15]. In our approach, as discussed below, we use a Cosine locality sensitive hashing (LSH) based approach because it allows us to explicitly set a trade-off between the performance of the attack (as the number of feature vectors to be compared) versus the probability of comparing similar nodes [15].…”
Section: Node Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many graph matching and alignment algorithms have been developed in research domains ranging from bioinformatics to multimedia information retrieval [11]. Such algorithms can be based on graph kernels [17], node and edge embeddings [14], or hashing [15]. In our approach, as discussed below, we use a Cosine locality sensitive hashing (LSH) based approach because it allows us to explicitly set a trade-off between the performance of the attack (as the number of feature vectors to be compared) versus the probability of comparing similar nodes [15].…”
Section: Node Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such algorithms can be based on graph kernels [17], node and edge embeddings [14], or hashing [15]. In our approach, as discussed below, we use a Cosine locality sensitive hashing (LSH) based approach because it allows us to explicitly set a trade-off between the performance of the attack (as the number of feature vectors to be compared) versus the probability of comparing similar nodes [15]. vectors for which we would need to calculate their similarities.…”
Section: Node Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Global aligners, on the other hand, use optimization functions that reward matches and penalize mismatches over the entire graph. In [37,36] [18,42,30].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our approach can be applied to attributed and unattributed graphs with virtually no change in formulation, and is unsupervised: it does not require prior alignment information to find high-quality matchings. Recent work [12] has used hand-engineered features, while our proposed approach leverages the power of latent feature representations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%